EEOC v. Freeman

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 05/12/2010. (elts, Deputy Clerk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. FREEMAN, Defendant. * * * * * * * Case No.: RWT 09cv2573 * * * * * *** ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order [Paper No. 22], and having conducted a telephone status conference with the parties on May 11, 2010, it is this 12th day of May, 2010, by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, ORDERED, that the Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order [Paper No. 22] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED, that the Scheduling Order be modified as follows: May 28, 2010: Deadline for conference re discovery of electronically stored information. (If either or both parties intend to take such discovery, before the conference counsel should review the Suggested Protocol for Discovery of Electronically Stored Information prepared by a Joint bench/bar committee published on the court's website.) Non-expert discovery deadline Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures re experts Defendant's Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures re experts

November 30, 2010: December 24, 2010: March 11, 2011:

April 22, 2011: May 20, 2011: May 20, 2011: May 20, 2011: June 24, 2011:

Plaintiff's rebuttal Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures re experts Rule 26(e)(2) supplementation of disclosures and responses Expert discovery deadline; submission of status report Requests for admission Dispositive pretrial motions deadline

/s/ ROGER W. TITUS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2