Gray v. Bagley et al

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 7/28/11. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 7/28/11)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

WILLIAM T. GRAY, III

v.
KIM BAGLEY, ET AL.

*
*
*
*
*
*
******

Civil No. – JFM-11-1117

MEMORANDUM

William T. Gray has filed this pro se action asserting a variety of claims, including ones
for employment discrimination and violation of his civil rights, arising from the fact that he was
denied employment as a school security assistant for the Board of Education of Prince George’s
County. Plaintiff has sued a variety of individuals but not the Board of Education itself. All of
the defendants, other than Emory Waters (who apparently has not been served) have filed
motions to dismiss. Plaintiff has responded to the motions.
All of the motions to dismiss will be granted and this action will be dismissed as to all
defendants, including Mr. Waters. Plaintiff has not included in the complaint any allegations
that indicate that any of the individuals whom he has named as defendants committed any
wrongs, particularly wrongs that are legally cognizable. Ordinarily, given plaintiff’s pro se
status, I would consider granting him leave to amend. However, it is clear not only from the
complaint but also from plaintiff’s oppositions to the motions to dismiss, that plaintiff’s
reasoning is disjointed and that he has no cognizable claims. Therefore, granting him leave to
amend would simply cause unnecessary expense and delay.

A separate order granting the motions to dismiss and dismissing this action for failing to
1

state a claim upon which relief can be granted as to all defendants is being entered herewith.

Date: July 28, 2011

/s/
J. Frederick Motz
United States District Judge

2