Betof v. Suburban Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 21 motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment filed by Defendants Suburban Hospital, Inc., and Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, DISMISSING all claims against Defendant John Hopkins H ealth System Corporation, ENTERING judgment in favor of Defendant Suburban Hospital, Inc., and against Plaintiff David Betof on count I, DISMISSING the gender discrimination claim filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981, DENYING [22-2] request for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(d) with regard to count I, and DENYING as moot [22-2] request for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(d) with regard to counts II and III. Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 6/29/12. (sat, Chambers)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
:
DAVID BETOF
:
v.

:

Civil Action No. DKC 11-1452

:
SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, INC., et al.
:
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion,
it is this 29th day of June, 2012, by the United States District
Court for the District of Maryland, ORDERED that:
1.

The motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary

judgment filed by Defendants Suburban Hospital, Inc., and Johns
Hopkins Health System Corporation (ECF No. 21) BE, and the same
hereby IS, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
2.

All

claims

against

Defendant

John

Hopkins

Health

System Corporation BE, and the same hereby ARE, DISMISSED;
3.
of

Judgment BE, and the same hereby IS, entered in favor

Defendant

Suburban

Hospital,

Inc.,

and

against

Plaintiff

David Betof on count I;
4.

The gender discrimination claim filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1981 BE, and the same hereby IS, DISMISSED;

5.

The request for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(d) filed

by Plaintiff David Betof (ECF No. 22-2) BE, and the same hereby
IS, DENIED with regard to count I;
5.

The request for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(d) filed

by Plaintiff David Betof (ECF No. 22-2) BE, and the same hereby
IS, DENIED AS MOOT with regard to counts II and III; and,
6.

The

clerk

will

transmit

copies

of

the

Memorandum

Opinion and this Order to counsel for the parties.

/s/
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW
United States District Judge

2