Quartey v. Soos

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 11/7/2011. (c/m 11/8/2011 rk) (ranks, Deputy Clerk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
MARY AKU QUARTEY
v.
INSPECTOR JOHN SOOS

*
* CIVIL ACTION NO. RWT-11-2391
*
***
MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff, a resident of Washington, D.C., filed this case as a pro-se plaintiff. The Complaint
is not a model of clarity. Plaintiff states the facts of the case as “I was refused to be released to work
for more than a year.” ECF No. 1. Plaintiff provides no basis for filing the complaint and her
attachments shed no light on the nature of her claim. Indeed, those documents are nonsensical as
they refer to plaintiff’s request to have the Bankruptcy Court return 40 million dollars Id.
Plaintiff’s complaint provides no jurisdictional or factual basis for its filing. Her attachments
are replete with fanciful illusions. The action shall be dismissed without prejudice for the failure to
state a claim and without service of process on defendant.1 A separate order shall follow.

Date: _November 7, 2011_

1

______/s/__________________________
Roger W. Titus
United States District Judge

Plaintiff has filed approximately twenty-seven cases in this court since December 2, 2009.
Given the frivolous nature of her filings, the court concludes that affording plaintiff the opportunity to amend
her complaint would be an exercise in futility.