Awah v. Capital One Bank

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 9/19/13 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 9/19/13. (sat, Chambers)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND : EDMUND AWAH : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 13-0706 : CAPITAL ONE BANK : MEMORANDUM OPINION Both pro se Plaintiff Edmund Awah and Defendant Capital One Bank have filed separate motions to dismiss in this case brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. 15 On July 1, 2013, Defendant moved to dismiss with prejudice for failure to state a claim, arguing that based on the face of Plaintiff’s complaint, Capital One Bank is a “creditor” and not a “debt collector” and therefore outside the FDCPA’s liability coverage. (ECF No. 8). On August 22, 2013, Plaintiff moved to dismiss this case, writing that “[t]he matter will now be filed in state court as the federal court is not the appropriate forum.” (ECF No. 13). Defendant had until September 9, 2013 to respond to this motion and has not done so. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Defendant has not served either an answer or motion for summary judgment. As Plaintiff’s notice does not state otherwise, this dismissal is without prejudice. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1)(B). motion will case shall be dismissed without prejudice. be granted and A separate order will follow. /s/ DEBORAH K. CHASANOW United States District Judge 2 the

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?