Basta v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
MEMORANDUM/ORDER a brief telephone status conference with counsel has been scheduled for May 7, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall be responsible for initiating the call. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 04/29/2013. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
ROGER W. TITUS
6500 CHERRYWOOD LANE
GREENBELT, MARYLAND 20770
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Counsel of Record
Judge Roger W. Titus
Notice of Telephone Status Conference
Albert Basta v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Civil Action No. RWT 13-1139
April 29, 2013
I have today issued the Court=s standard form of Scheduling Order, and am scheduling a
brief telephone status conference with counsel on May 7, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. Counsel for the
Plaintiff shall be responsible for initiating the call.
There are several reasons for scheduling a telephone status conference in connection with
the issuance of the Scheduling Order. First, I want to be certain that counsel consider quite
carefully the availability of early mediation services by a Magistrate Judge of this Court, and the
desirability of consent to all further proceedings by a Magistrate Judge. These are options that
should be carefully considered, and I urge all parties to do so.
Second, the issuance of the Scheduling Order authorizes the initiation of discovery, and I
want to be certain that all counsel are aware of the obligations imposed upon them as part of the
discovery process. I urge all counsel to review carefully before the status conference the
decision of then Chief Magistrate Judge (now United States District Judge) Paul Grimm in the
case of Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Services Co., 253 F.R.D. 354 (D. Md. 2008). The
following is a link to the decision for your convenience:
If counsel read this decision and apply the rules in accordance with that decision, it is quite likely
that the level of discovery disputes, if any, will be reduced appreciably.
Third, I believe that the parties should confer with each other and be prepared to discuss
with me during the telephone status conference their views on the nature and extent of discovery
that may be required in this case, with a view towards minimizing wasteful and unnecessary
Fourth, any concerns regarding the dates set forth in the Scheduling Order should be
raised by counsel in the telephone status conference.
Despite the informal nature of this memorandum, it shall constitute an Order of Court and
be docketed accordingly.
Roger W. Titus
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?