Banegas v. General Lawn Service Corporation et al
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying request for an Order dismissing action; directing parties to submit a joint statement eitherexplaining why the judgment reflects a fair and reasonable resolution of a bonafide dispute over FLSA provisions or that it compensates Plaintiff fully for allamounts due within 14 days. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 7/17/2014. (aos, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Southern Division
CHRISTIAN
*
*
BANEGAS,
Plaintiff,
*
v.
Case No.: GJH-13-3728
*
GENERAL LAWN SERVICE
CORPORATION,
et al.
*
Defendants.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MEMORANDUM
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
OPINION AND ORDER
This opinion and order addresses the parties' Rule 111 Notice (ECF No. 12), filed on
June 17,2014. The parties first filed a Rule 68(a) Offer of Judgment and Plaintiff's Acceptance
of Defendant's
Offer of Judgment on May 27, 2014 (ECF No. 10). Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 68(a) instructs the court to enter judgment
after receiving an accepted offer of
judgment. However, the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") (the cause of action alleged in this
suit) does not permit settlement or compromise except with (l) supervision by the Secretary of
Labor or (2) a judicial finding that the settlement reflects "a reasonable compromise of disputed
issues" rather than "a mere waiver of statutory rights brought about by an employer's
overreaching." Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. Us., 679 F.2d 1350, 1354 (lith Cir. 1982); see also
Lopez v. NT!, LLC, 748 F. Supp. 2d 471 (D. Md. 2010) (explaining that courts assess FLSA
settlements for reasonableness). Accordingly, the FLSA modifies Rule 68(a) such that in claims
filed under the FLSA, the court will enter judgment when presented with an offer and acceptance
only after the court is satisfied that the settlement is a reasonable compromise.
To bring the parties in compliance with the FLSA, on May 29, 2014, the Court' ordered
the parties to submit a joint statement "either explaining why th(e] judgment reflects a fair and
reasonable
resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions or that it compensates
Plaintiff fully for all amounts due." (ECF No. 11).
In lieu of filing the joint statement as ordered, on June 17, 2014, the parties filed a Local
Rule III Notice informing the Court that the parties have settled and requested that the Court
dismiss the case without prejudice and permit either party to move for good cause to reopen the
action within sixty (60) days. (ECF No. 12). The parties note that they anticipate providing the
Court with a stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and will not seek
Court approval of the FLSA settlement. Rule 4I(a)(l)(A)(ii)
permits the plaintiff to dismiss an
action without court order by filing "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
appeared." Similar to Rule 68(a), however, this general rule is subject to "any applicable federal
statute," which includes the FLSA. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4I(a)(I)(A).
To be clear, "(0]ther than ...
payment supervised by the Department of Labor, there is
only one context in which compromises of FLSA back wage or liquidated damage claims may be
allowed: a stipulated judgment
entered by a court which has determined that a settlement
proposed by an employer and employees ...
is a fair and reasonable res( 0 ]lution of a bona fide
dispute over FLSA provisions." Lynn's Food Stores, Inc., 679 F.2d at 1355. This procedure
furthers the FLSA's goal of protecting workers' rights. See id. at 1352-54. Thus, this Court holds
that neither Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68(a) nor 4I(a)(l)(A)(ii)
can be used as a way to
avoid the FLSA requirement that courts review settlements of claims brought under FLSA for
reasonableness. To hold otherwise would effectively dispense of that requirement. Accordingly,
At the time of the May 29 Order, this case was assigned to Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow.
Since that time, the case has been reassigned to the undersigned.
I
2
it is this 17th day of July, 2014, by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
ORDERED that:
1.
The request of the parties for an order dismissing the action is DENIED
2.
Within fourteen (14) days, the parties are to submit a joint statement either
explaining why the judgment reflects a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona
fide
dispute over FLSA provisions or that it compensates Plaintiff fully for all
amounts due; and
3.
The clerk will transmit a copy of this order to counsel for the parties.
___
/S/
_
George J. Hazel
United States District Judge
Dated: July 17,2014
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?