Dowtin v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 3/27/2015. (sat, Chambers)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
:
JOHN DOWTIN
:
v.
:
Civil Action No. DKC 14-3564
:
WASHINGTON METRO AREA TRANSIT
AUTHORITY
:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
John Dowtin filed suit in the Circuit Court for Prince
George’s
County
Washington
on
or
Metropolitan
about
Area
September
Transit
16,
2014,
Authority
against
(“WMATA”)
for
injuries allegedly inflicted by a former WMATA employee on or
about September 2, 2011.
The complaint asserts a claim for
negligent hiring and retention.
(See ECF No. 2).
WMATA removed
the case to this court and moved to dismiss, contending that
governmental immunity protects it from the claim asserted or,
alternatively,
limitations.
that
the
claim
(See ECF No. 10).
is
barred
by
the
statute
of
When Plaintiff did not respond
to the motion, a show cause order directed Plaintiff to respond.
(ECF
No.
counsel
11).
for
Instead
Plaintiff
of
responding
notified
the
on
court
the
that
merits,
Plaintiff
died, and that the family elected not to pursue the case.
ECF No. 12).
prior
had
(See
The court then notified counsel, by reference to
Coppinger v. Schantag, No. Civ.A. DKC 2005-2380, 2006 WL 38946
(D.Md. Jan. 5, 2006), that the client’s death terminated his
agency relationship and that his notice would not constitute a
notice of death on the record under Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a).
Nothing
further has been filed.
Under the circumstances, the complaint will be dismissed.
The
failure
to
oppose
a
motion
to
dismiss
constitutes
an
abandonment of the claim, and the failure to prosecute an action
similarly leads to dismissal.
Here, both arguments asserted in
the motion to dismiss are colorable, and the action has been
abandoned.
A separate order will be entered.
/s/
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?