Garvin v. IAD Auto, Inc.

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 4/29/2015. (kns, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 4/29/15)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND PETER J. MESSITTE 6500 CHERRYWOOD LANE GREENBELT, MARYLAND 20770 301-344-0632 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM TO: Counsel of Record FROM: Judge Peter J. Messitte RE: Garvin v. IAD Auto, Inc. Civil No. PJM 14-3566 DATE: April 29, 2015 *** On March 25, 2015, the Court was advised by counsel for Garvin that significant communication difficulties have developed between counsel and Garvin which make it impossible for counsel to represent Garvin effectively and ethically. See ECF No. 10. Counsel for Garvin advises that in the last few months, he has made several attempts to contact Garvin by telephone, text message and mail. He advises that he has complied with Local Rule 101.2.a by filing a certificate stating (a) the name and last known address of his client, and (b) that a written notice has been mailed to his client at least seven days prior to the filing of the motion advising the client of his proposed withdrawal. IAD Auto consents to this Motion. ECF No. 12. On April 8, 2015, the Court mailed to Garvin’s last known address an Order, ECF No. 11, directing Garvin to show cause by letter to the Court whether he intended to continue with this case even if his counsel is granted leave to withdraw, and whether he intended to secure new counsel or represent himself. If Garvin failed to respond within twenty days of the date of the letter, the Order indicated that the Court would dismiss the case without prejudice. On April 17, 2015, the Court’s letter to Garvin was returned undeliverable. To date, the Court has received no communication from Garvin. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS counsel for Garvin’s Motion to Withdraw, ECF No. 10, and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Complaint, ECF No. 2. A separate Order will follow. /s/ PETER J. MESSITTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: Court File

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?