Aghazu v. Severn Savings Bank, FSB et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM / ORDER re 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Severn Savings Bank, FSB and 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by FCI Lender Services, Inc, Pontus Capital. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 11/9/2015. (aos, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND PETER J. MESSITTE 6500 CHERRYWOOD LANE GREENBELT, MARYLAND 20770 301-344-0632 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM TO: Counsel of Record FROM: Judge Peter J. Messitte RE: Aghazu v. Severn Savings Bank, FSB, et al. Civil Case No. PJM 15-1529 DATE: November 9, 2015 **** On November 9, 2015, the Court heard oral argument on Defendant Severn Savings Bank, FSB’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5, and Defendants FCI Lender Services and Pontus Capital’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 10. As stated on the record, the Court ORDERS 1. Pontus SB Trust (hereinafter “Pontus”) SHALL be substituted for Pontus Capital as a Defendant in this matter; 2. Plaintiff’s Count V is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Severn Savings Bank, FSB; 3. Plaintiff SHALL file a Response to Defendants FCI Lender Services and Pontus’ Motion to Dismiss Count V within ten (10) days of this Order; Defendants FCI Lender Services and Pontus shall have five (5) days to file a Reply; 4. Plaintiff SHALL promptly submit to the Court the response FCI Lender Services made to Plaintiff’s Qualified Written Request relative to attorney’s fees and other charges; 5. Defendants SHALL file additional briefing on statutes of limitations defenses as to all pertinent Counts within ten (10) days of this Order; Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days to file a Response, and Defendants shall have five (5) days to file a Reply. Despite the informal nature of this ruling, it shall constitute an Order of the Court and the Clerk is directed to docket it accordingly. /s/ PETER J. MESSITTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: Court File

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?