Redmond v. Webb et al

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 8/17/2015. (c/m 8/18/15 jnls, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SANDRA REDMOND : Plaintiff v. : : CIVIL ACTION NO. PJM-15-2383 FRANK R. WEBB, CHIEF : MILTON DEAN, OFFICER FOREST HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT : TOWN OF FOREST HEIGHTS, : MUNICIPALITY : Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION The above-captioned action, filed on August 13, 2015, is the third attempt by Plaintiff Sandra Redmond, a self-represented litigant and Maryland resident, to obtain money damages for alleged civil rights violations based on encounters with members of the Forest Heights Police Department on April 4 and 5, 2011. See Redmond v. Forest Heights Police Department and Representatives, et al., Civil Action No. RWT-14-1056 (D. Md.) (“Redmond I”) see also Redmond v. Webb, et al., Civil Action No. GJH-14-3259 (D. Md.) (“Redmond II”). While Plaintiff will be granted in forma pauperis status, her Complaint will be summarily dismissed. Redmond I was dismissed without prejudice after Plaintiff failed to comply with court order by providing completed summonses as repeatedly directed. ECF No. 9, Civil Action No. RWT-14-1056. On October 17, 2014, Plaintiff re-filed the Complaint (“Redmond II”), again setting forth allegations of civil rights violations during her April 4 and 5, 2011 encounters with the Forest Heights Police Department. See Redmond v. Webb, et al., Civil Action No. GJH-14-3259 (D. Md.). The case was dismissed as time-barred on October 23, 2014. Id., ECF No. 3. That determination prevents Plaintiff’s instant attempt to litigate the same allegations against the same Defendants. The Complaint shall be dismissed. A separate Order follows. /s/ PETER J. MESSITTE August 17, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?