Myles-Anderson v. The EMMES Corporation
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 3/3/2017. (c/m 3/3/17 rss)(rss, Deputy Clerk)
'I ~ I'
C
'I
"
,',
,.'
1'1
I
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
..,
SOlltherll Dh'i,\'ioll
1\
I
.~.
\
, ••.•••
~,.
T ANESHA MYLES-ANDERSON,
*
Plaintiff,
*
Case No.: G.I1I- I :;-246 I
Y.
*
THE EMMES CORPORATION,
*
Defendant.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MEMORANDUM
PlaintiffTanesha
Myles-Anderson
against her fClrIner employcr.
violations
("Plaintiff'
or "Myles-Anderson")
("Delendan\"'
of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 42 U.S.c.
termination.
*
*
brings suit pro se
or "EMMES").
fc)r allcged
~ 2000e el self .. Md. Code.
7. 20 I J
Cty. Code ~ 27-19 arising from hcr Novcmber
Plainti 1'1'
claims that hcr termination
discrimination.
*
OPINION
the EMMES Corporation
State Gov't ~ 20-606. and Montgomery
Judgmcnt.
*
*
was in retaliation
Presently pending befcJrc the Court is Defendant's
ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has not responded
fc)r ber complaints
of racial
Motion fc))'Summary
to Defendant's
Motion. and the time jC)r
doing so has expired. See Eel' No. 19. No hearing is necessary.
See Loc. R. 105.6. For the
fc)lIowing reasons.
is granted.
I.
Defendant's
Motion for Summary
Judgment
BACKGROUND
Tanesha
Maryland
Myles-Anderson
was employed
as an Olliee Scrvices Manager
at the EMMES Corporation
in Rockville.
from Fcbruary 22. 2011 until November
7. 20D.
ECF
No. \8-1 at I. I Myles-Andcrson
Scrviccs Managcr.
is African Amcrican.
Myles-Andcrson
cntering and maintaining
was rcsponsiblc
ncw hirc and employcc
supplics. and making prcscntations
ECI' No. 1 ~ 2. In hcr position as Oflice
atncw
for various administrative
information.
hirc oricntations.
tasks. including
ordcring name platcs and oflicc
ECI' No. 18-1 at 2: ECI' No. IX-3 at
2.
In July of2013.
Mylcs-Andcrson
receivcd two cmails Ii'Dln Brian Hochhcimcr.
Vicc Prcsident and Chicf Financial Onker.
punctuality.
Andcrson
ECF No. \8-1 at 2. According
cxprcssing
his displeasurc
to Hochhcimcr's
told hcr. "Itlhis is not acceptable.
and wc nced to be on time'" Id. Myles-Andcrson
July 9. 2013. Ilochheimcr
written warning to Myles-Andcrson
attcntion
thc email.ld.
In addition.
this cmail. Id. J Ilochheimer
on July 10.2013.
2
On
about arriving latc. lie statcd. "On
I understand
and rcady to usc ... This is unexcusable'"
rcceived and acknowlcdged
ECF No. 18-7
with our ncw hires
receivcd and acknowledgcd
Monday. you were latc arriving to work and late for oricntation.
3. Myles-Andcrson
prcsentation.
It is our lirst interaction
again emailed Myles-Anderson
all the ncw hirc badgcs were activatcd
with hcr lack of
cmail datcd July 2. 2013. Mylcs-
had arrivcd late to hcr portion of the ncw hirc oricntation
at 2. Ilochheimcr
EM/vIES
thaI not
ECI' No. I x-x at
issucd a f
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?