George v. McDonough et al
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 8/17/2017. (c/m 8/17/2017 aos, Deputy Clerk)
C"
IN TIlE UNITEI> STATES D1STI{ICT COUR!L';,'
FOR TilE I>ISTRICT OF MARYLANI> l,.J I , ••v,
SO/llltel'll
TEHIWN
GEOIHa:,
znn
DiI';s;o/l
*
Plaintiff,
FILED. C:.,,~ ,T
,. I
.
: ;:":"
L,:,::J
r"'r:,....
"
, ••••
AUG11 A 10: 22
,
C' ... ,.
..-
,..'
.', ~':...
*
v.
*
MARY LOU MCI>ONOUGH,
el
Civil Actinn I'In. G,JII-16-1J53
al.,
*
I>cfcndants.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MEMORANI>UM
PlaintiffTehron
this pro se 42
at Princc Gcorgc's
*
*
claim against Dcfcndants
and Law Librarian B. McTcrnan
*
*
*
OPINION
Gcorgc. an inmatc at thc Ccntral tvlaryland Corrcctional
U.s.c. ~ 1983
Mcrccdcs Ilcrnandcz
•
*
Facility. brings
Wan.lcn \1ary LOll i\!cDonollgh.
Dr.
IlH'dcnying him acccss tothc law library
County Detention Ccntcr ("PGCDC").
dcnying him acccss to thc gric\',lIKc
proccss. and placing him in an unclean cell alicr Gcorgc wcnt on a hungcr strikc. ECF No. I.
DcICndants McDonough
and McTcrnan
havc Iiled a Motion to Dismiss or altcrnatively
Summary .Judgmcnt. lOCI' No. 12. Tbc Court lil1lls a hcaring in this mattcr unncccssary.
I.ocal Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2016). For thc rcasons that Il)llow. Dcfcndants'
arc dismisscd.
DcICndant llernandcz.
PlaintifTshal1 be givcn thc opportunity
SCI'
Motion. construcd as a
Motion IlH' Summary .Judgmcnt. shall bc grantcd. and thc claims against i\!cDonough
McTiernan
Illr
and
to amcnd his complaint against
I.
BACKGROUND
I'laintiffGeorge
SykesYi lie. Maryland.
is currently an inmate at the Central Maryland Correctional
Facility in
\\here he has resided since at least October 2016.1 While preyiously
housed at "GCDC as a pre-trial detainee from July 2015 to August 2015 and from January 2016
to June 2016. George filed a sell~represenled
seeking money damages against I'GCnC
ci\'il rights complaint
Warden Mary Lou McDonough.
Ilernandez.
and L
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?