Seikaly, Administrator v. Seikaly

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM/ORDER Scheduling a Hearing for September 8, 2016 at 3:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 8/10/2016. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ROGER W. TITUS 6500 CHERRYWOOD LANE GREENBELT, MARYLAND 20770 301-344-0052 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM TO: Counsel of Record FROM: Judge Roger W. Titus RE: Rudolph Mounib Seikaly, as Administrator of the Estate of Mounib Seikaly, Deceased, and as Personal Representative v. Richard Seikaly Civil Case No. RWT 16-2632 DATE: August 10, 2016 ******** Please be advised that a hearing has been scheduled for September 8, 2016 at 3:30 p.m. on all pending motions. The parties will be allotted one (1) hour for total argument. The Defendant is directed to file a reply, if any, to his Rule 26(b)(3) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or in the Alternative to Compel Arbitration and Stay These Proceedings (ECF No. 8) on or before September 2, 2016. Please note, however, that I may choose to decide these motions on the pleadings before the date scheduled for argument. If so, you will be notified sufficiently in advance of that date. Counsel should bring copies for both the Court and opposing counsel of the principal cases on which they intend to rely during oral argument. Please also highlight the appropriate text. My law clerks and I spend a considerable amount of time preparing for hearings in order to reach a fair and well-informed decision. The parties are advised that they must inform the Court at least ten (10) days prior to the scheduled hearing in the event that circumstances arise that may result in the need for a continuance, stay or cancellation of the hearing. Despite the informal nature of this memorandum, it shall constitute an Order of Court and be docketed accordingly. /s/ Roger W. Titus United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?