Seikaly, Administrator v. Seikaly
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM/ORDER Scheduling a Hearing for September 8, 2016 at 3:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 8/10/2016. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
ROGER W. TITUS
6500 CHERRYWOOD LANE
GREENBELT, MARYLAND 20770
301-344-0052
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Counsel of Record
FROM:
Judge Roger W. Titus
RE:
Rudolph Mounib Seikaly, as Administrator of the Estate of Mounib Seikaly,
Deceased, and as Personal Representative v. Richard Seikaly
Civil Case No. RWT 16-2632
DATE:
August 10, 2016
********
Please be advised that a hearing has been scheduled for September 8, 2016 at 3:30 p.m. on all
pending motions. The parties will be allotted one (1) hour for total argument. The Defendant is
directed to file a reply, if any, to his Rule 26(b)(3) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or in the
Alternative to Compel Arbitration and Stay These Proceedings (ECF No. 8) on or before
September 2, 2016.
Please note, however, that I may choose to decide these motions on the pleadings before the date
scheduled for argument. If so, you will be notified sufficiently in advance of that date.
Counsel should bring copies for both the Court and opposing counsel of the principal cases on which
they intend to rely during oral argument. Please also highlight the appropriate text.
My law clerks and I spend a considerable amount of time preparing for hearings in order to reach a
fair and well-informed decision. The parties are advised that they must inform the Court at least ten
(10) days prior to the scheduled hearing in the event that circumstances arise that may result in the
need for a continuance, stay or cancellation of the hearing.
Despite the informal nature of this memorandum, it shall constitute an Order of Court and be
docketed accordingly.
/s/
Roger W. Titus
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?