Francis v. Western Corr. Inst. et al
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 8/14/2017. (c/m 8/15/2017 tds, Deputy Clerk)
FILED
U.S.r:ST'::cr ere::r
IN THE UNITED STATES ()JSTRICt;C~lllR(JI:.:= i-::,:;YLA::)
FOR TIlE ()JSTRICT OF MARYLAN()
SOl/tit
CHRISTOPHER
SCOTT FRANCIS,
)011 AUG
III P 5: 05
em DiI';liOl/
*
~y.._-
I'laintiff,
*
\'.
Case No.: G.JII-16-2li9li
*
WESTERN CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION, et ill.,
*
Defendants.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MEMORAN()UM
Plaintiff Christopher
Correctional
Institution
seeking monetary
damages
Dismiss or Alternatively
No. 24. and Plaintitrs
hearing is necessary.
Presently
I.
tllr Summary
Judgmen\.
Motion to Reconsider
at the Western
relief Irom Defendants
~ 19X3.
WCI and Wcxford
Motion to
ECF No. 13. WCI's Motion to Dismiss.
Denial of Additional
Disc(l\'ery.
lOCI'
ECF No. 21. No
Motion to Reconsider
Denial of Additional
is denied.
BACKGROUND
dermatitis.
Pin ciles
*
S'!!e Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2016). For rcasons that tollo\\'. Defendants'
In the Complain\.
I
inmate incarcerated
pending beli.lre the Court is Wexilm!'s
Motions to Dismiss arc granted. and Plaintilrs
Discovery
*
hrings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 lJ.S.c.
and other miscellaneous
Ilcalth Sources ("Wexti.ml").
'*
*
OPINION
Scott Francis. a selt:represented
("Wcn.
*
10
PlaintilTstates
and allergy conditions
documents
filed
011
that his preseriptionmedications
Ii.))'his arthritis.
expired. ECF No. I at 4.1 Francis complains
the Court"s electronic
filing system (CMIECF)
that although
refer to the page numbers
he
gcnt.:ratcd
liled inflmnal complaints and sought administrative
medication
in May of 20 16. his medications
remedies regarding the expiration of his
were not renewed. 1<1. Francis aCKnowledges that on
..2 was delivered to provide him"some"
.July 21.2016_ an m1hritis medication--Meloxicam
rclief.
but he was not provided his dermatitis cream or his allergy spray. Id at 5. Plaintiff claims he was
informed that the order Ill!' the medications
"was never put in:'
1tI.
PlaintifT Iiled the instant Complaint on August 17. 2016. ECF No. I. On November 28.
2016. DetCndant Wexllml Iiled a Motion to Dismiss. or Alternatively.
whieh remains unopposed
wcrs
unopposed
Il11" ummary .Judgment.
S
as of the signature date.-' ECF No. 13. Also pending is Defendalll
Motion to Dismiss.-l ECF No. 24. In addition. Francis has Iiled a Motion
Reconsider the Denial of his Request Il)r Additional
10
Discovery. ECF No. 21.
This Court previously denied Francis' Motion to Expand the Record. noting that Francis
had not shown the relevance of documents
declaration.
rebuttal oppositions
he seeks. nor his inability to cran. through aflidm'it or
which present "facts essential to justify [his] opposition"
hased
upon the record presented to the court. ECF No. 18; srr Fcd. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Id. In his iVlotion
to Reconsider.
indecipherable.
Francis contends that the record presented to the Court is incomplctc.
and inconclusive.
inaccurate.
ECF No. 21 at 2. He therell)re claims that he requires acccss to
his entirc medical record and siCK-cali histories. Id Wexllml opposes the rcconsiderationmotion.
ECF No. 23. The issues presented Il)r review by the Complaint and Defendant WCTs response
do not involve a substantive
or complicated
analysis of the lilCtS. Francis has failed to shO\v that
bv that s\'stcm.
:!~\tfcloxi~al11 used to treat arthritis. It reduces pain. swelling. and stiffness ofthc joints. Mcloxicam
is
nonsteroidal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?