International Refugee Assistance Project et al v. Trump et al

Filing 202

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David Hausman (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-6926867.) by HIAS, Inc., Allan Hakky, Paul Harrison, International Refugee Assistance Project, Jane Doe # 2, John Does 1 & 3, Muhammed Meteab, Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc., Ibrahim Ahmed Mohomed, Samaneh Takaloo(Rocah, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, et al. * * Case No. 8:17-cv-00361-TDC * Trump, et al. * MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE I, David Rocah , am a member in good standing of the bar of this Court. I am moving the admission of David Hausman to appear pro hac vice in this case as counsel for Plaintiffs . We certify that: 1. The proposed admittee is not a member of the Maryland bar and does not maintain any law office in Maryland 2. The proposed admittee is a member in good standing of the bars of the following State Courts and/or United States Courts: State Court & Date of Admission State Bar of New York 06/14/2017 U.S. Court & Date of Admission U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 08/10/2017 3. During the twelve months immediately preceding this motion, the proposed admittee 0 has been admitted pro hac vice in this Court ____________ times. 4. The proposed admittee has never been disbarred, suspended, or denied admission to practice law in any jurisdiction. (NOTE: If the proposed admittee has been disbarred, suspended, or denied admission to practice law in any jurisdiction, then he/she must submit a statement fully explaining all relevant facts.) 5. The proposed admittee is familiar with the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Local Rules of this Court, and understands he/she shall be subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court. PHVMotion (08/2015) Page 1 of 2 6. The proposed admittee understands admission pro hac vice is for this case only and does not constitute formal admission to the bar of this Court. 7. Either the undersigned movant or _________________________________________, is also a member of the bar of this Court in good standing, and will serve as cocounsel in these proceedings. 8. The $50.00 fee for admission pro hac vice accompanies this motion. 9. We hereby certify under penalties of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. MOVANT /s/ David Rocah PROPOSED ADMITTEE /s/ David Hausman (signed by David Rocah with permission David Hausman) David Robert Rocah, #27315 David Hausman, NY #5510011 Printed name and bar number Printed name and bar number ACLU of Maryland American Civil Liberties Union Office name Office name 3600 Clipper Mill Rd., #350, Baltimore, MD 21217 125 Broad Street, 18th Fl., New York, NY 10004 Address Address rocah@aclu-md.org dhausman@aclu.org Email Address Email Address 410-889-8555 212-549-2549 Telephone number Telephone number 410-366-7838 212-549-2654 Fax Number Fax Number PHVMotion (08/2015) Page 2 of 2 U.S. Court & Date of Admission: Cecillia Derphine Wang 1. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 27, 2012 2. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit July 25, 2011 3. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit July 14, 2011 4. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit July 31, 2009 5. Supreme Court of the U.S. October 1, 2007 6. U.S. District Court, Central District of California August 23, 2006 7. U.S. District Court, Southern District of California July 17, 2006 8. U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York August 23, 2005 9. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York August 23, 2005 10. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit June 9, 2005 11. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit(inactive) September 12, 2000 12. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit June 29, 1998 13. U.S. District Court, Northern District of California June 19, 1998

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?