International Refugee Assistance Project et al v. Trump et al
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Linda B. Evarts (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7040875.) by John Doe #4, John Doe #5, HIAS, Inc., International Refugee Assistance Project, Jane Doe # 2, John Does 1 & 3, Muhammed Meteab, Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc.(Cox, Justin)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al.,
Case No. 17-cv-00361-TDC
DONALD TRUMP, et al.,
MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
I, Justin B. Cox
, am a member in good standing of the bar of this
Court. I am moving the admission of Linda B. Evarts
to appear pro hac vice in this case as counsel for Plaintiffs
We certify that:
1. The proposed admittee is not a member of the Maryland bar and does not maintain
any law office in Maryland
2. The proposed admittee is a member in good standing of the bars of the following
State Courts and/or United States Courts:
State Court & Date of Admission
U.S. Court & Date of Admission
New York - March 2014
3. During the twelve months immediately preceding this motion, the proposed admittee
has been admitted pro hac vice in this Court ____________ times.
4. The proposed admittee has never been disbarred, suspended, or denied admission to
practice law in any jurisdiction. (NOTE: If the proposed admittee has been
disbarred, suspended, or denied admission to practice law in any jurisdiction, then
he/she must submit a statement fully explaining all relevant facts.)
5. The proposed admittee is familiar with the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional
Conduct, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Local Rules of this Court, and
understands he/she shall be subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court.
Page 1 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?