International Refugee Assistance Project et al v. Trump et al

Filing 42

CORRECTED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Cecillia Wang by HIAS, Inc., Allan Hakky, International Refugee Assistance Project, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1-4, Samaneh Takaloo. The fee has already been paid.(Rocah, David)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, et al.

*
*

Case No. 8:17-cv-00361-TDC

*

Trump, et al.

*
MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

I, David Rocah

, am a member in good standing of the bar of this

Court. I am moving the admission of Cecillia D. Wang
to appear pro hac vice in this case as counsel for Plaintiffs

.

We certify that:
1. The proposed admittee is not a member of the Maryland bar and does not maintain
any law office in Maryland
2. The proposed admittee is a member in good standing of the bars of the following
State Courts and/or United States Courts:
State Court & Date of Admission

U.S. Court & Date of Admission

State Bar of California 04/01/1997

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 9/29/2014

State Bar of New York 02/26/2003

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan 2/01/2013

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2/02/2013

Please See Attached
3. During the twelve months immediately preceding this motion, the proposed admittee
0
has been admitted pro hac vice in this Court ____________ times.
4. The proposed admittee has never been disbarred, suspended, or denied admission to
practice law in any jurisdiction. (NOTE: If the proposed admittee has been
disbarred, suspended, or denied admission to practice law in any jurisdiction, then
he/she must submit a statement fully explaining all relevant facts.)
5. The proposed admittee is familiar with the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional
Conduct, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Local Rules of this Court, and
understands he/she shall be subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court.
PHVMotion (08/2015)

Page 1 of 2

6. The proposed admittee understands admission pro hac vice is for this case only and
does not constitute formal admission to the bar of this Court.
7. Either the undersigned movant or _________________________________________,
is also a member of the bar of this Court in good standing, and will serve as cocounsel in these proceedings.
8. The $50.00 fee for admission pro hac vice accompanies this motion.
9. We hereby certify under penalties of perjury that the foregoing statements are true
and correct.
MOVANT
/s/ David Rocah

PROPOSED ADMITTEE
/s/ Cecillia D. Wang
(signed by David Rocah with permission Cecillia D. Wang)

David Robert Rocah, #27315

Cecillia Derphine Wang, Cal.#187782, NY #4122889

Printed name and bar number

Printed name and bar number

ACLU of Maryland

American Civil Liberties Union

Office name

Office name

3600 Clipper Mill Rd., #350, Baltimore, MD 21217

39 Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 94111

Address

Address

[e-mail]

[e-mail]

Email Address

Email Address

410-889-8555

(415)-343-0775

Telephone number

Telephone number

410-366-7838

(415)-395-0950

Fax Number

Fax Number

PHVMotion (08/2015)

Page 2 of 2

U.S. Court & Date of Admission: Cecillia Derphine Wang
1. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

February 27, 2012

2. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

July 25, 2011

3. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

July 14, 2011

4. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

July 31, 2009

5. Supreme Court of the U.S.

October 1, 2007

6. U.S. District Court, Central District of California

August 23, 2006

7. U.S. District Court, Southern District of California

July 17, 2006

8. U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

August 23, 2005

9. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York

August 23, 2005

10. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

June 9, 2005

11. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit(inactive)

September 12, 2000

12. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

June 29, 1998

13. U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

June 19, 1998