The District of Columbia et al v. Trump

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against Donald J. Trump (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 84637030093), filed by The District of Columbia, The State of Maryland. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Summons, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kns, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 48 I' (; , '1/,,/:"). / v /""1 j/C "~'.-'/ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR?JI,A . 1(;;;':., FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ~/ /2 ";;:/ Greenbelt Division C,-., 4;.. . '7 . A,(I '(." 9: ,'), 'CI:-~';'le,o- c:u THE DISTRICT OF COLUl\IBlA 441 Fourth Street, l\.W. Washington, D.C. 2000 I, . -" ~ . if' 'O~ PI;' I and Y <-' THE STATE OF MARYLAND 200 Saint Paul Place, 20th ]-loor Baltimore, :-'lar:-1and 21202, Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, / t;. - eV~{)/59& - !JI1 v. DONALD J. TRUl\IP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America 1600 Pennsyl\'ania Avenue, K\\'. Washington, D.C. 20500, Defendant. COMPLAINT BRIA:-: E. FROSH Attorney General of :-'laryland STE\'E:-: :-'1. SULLlVA:-: Federal Bar No. 24930 ssullivan@oag.statc.md.us PATRICK B. HCGHES Federal Bar No. 19492 ph ughes@oag.state.md.us Assistant Attorneys General 200 Saint Paul Place, 20th Floor Baltimore, l\laryland 21202 T: (410) 576-6325 10: (410) 576-6955 KARL A. RAcr:-:E' Attorney General for the District of Columbia O. LUDA\I'AY Chief Deputy Attorney General Federal Bar No. 12533 na talie.! udaway@dc.gov STEI'HA:-:IE E. Lrros' Senior Counsel to the Attorney General stephanie.1 itos@de.gov 441 Fourth Street, N,W. Washington, D.C. 20001 T: (202) 724-1521 10: (202) 730-1837 NATALIE 'jno hac vice ap/Jlicalionjorlhcomillg Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 2 of 48 1\.OAII D. BOOKIlI:\DER* nhookbinder@citizcnsforethics.org STUART C. ~ICPHAIL* smcphail@citizcnsforethics.org Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 455 ~lassachllsetts ,\\oclllle, 1\'.\\'., 6th \\'ashinb'lon, D.C. 20001 '1': (202) 408-5565 F: (202) 588-5020 *llfO hac "ire allplication forthcoming 1'1001' Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 3 of 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Nature of the action II. Panics, jurisdiction, 1 and \'enue III. I,egal background IV. Reb'ant 7 8 facts 10 A. The defendant's Foreign Emoluments Clause \;olations 10 B. The defendant's Domestic Emoluments Clause \;olations 24 C. Post-inauguration D. The plaintiff>' interests in this litigation premium for the defendant's goods and sen;ces 30 30 V. Claims 41 VI. Prayer for relief 44 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 4 of 48 I. NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action against Donald j. Trump in his official capacity as President of I. the United States. The case invokes that have injured and threaten unprecedented to cause continuing Disuict") and the State of 1\Iaryland (":\Iaryland") constitutional \iolations by the President i'1jury to the Disuict of Columbia ("the and their respective residents, including direct injury to the plaintifls' interests in properties located in the District, in Prince George's County, :\Iaryland, and in :\Iontgomery 2. County, :\Iaryland. The lawsuit alleges \'iolations by the President of two distinct yet related prO\isions of the U.S. Constitution that seek to make certain that he faithfully serves the American people, free from compromising financial entanglements with foreign and domestic governments officials. The first prO\ision, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, prohibits any "Person holding any Ollice of Profit or Trust" from accepting "any present, Emolument, Olfice, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or forcign State," absent "the Consent of the Congress." Const. art. I, S 9, cl. 8. The sccond, the Domestic Emoluments \\ithin that Period any other from the United States, or any of them." U.S. Const. art. II, these prO\isions help ensure that the President selyes with undivided Vested by the Constitution with extraordinary S I, d. 7. Together, loyalty to the American people, and the American people only. Our republican form of government 3. demands no less. powcr, the President is bound by oath to "faithfully execute" his oflice and "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution United States." Since 1789, each Presidcnt, regardless of temperament in his own way, to honor that is the Constitution's demand solen111 YOW. U.S. Clause, entitles the President to receive a salary while in office and forbids him fi'OIn "receiv[ing] Emolument and of the or ideology, has sought, 'Yet fundamental to a President's fidelity to that oath that the President, as the highest officeholder in tl,e land, Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 5 of 48 disentangle his pri,.ate finances from those of domestic and foreign powers. Ne,'er before has a President acted with snch disregard for this constitutional 4. Trump~s continued President ownership prescription. interest in a global business clnplfc, which renders him deeply enmeshed with a legion of foreign and domestic go\"(~rnment actors, ,'iolates the Constitution and calls into question the rule of law and the integrity of the conntry's political system. "'hate,'er the sincerity of the persons iJ1\'oh-ed, foreign and domestic oflicials arc put in the position of considering President is important whether to maintaining the President's decision-making oficling henefits to businesscs associated with the goodwill. And irrespective of whcther such benefits affect or shift his loreign or domestic policy, uncertainty about whether the President is acting in the best interests of the American people, or rather for his own ends or personal enrichment, inOicts lasting harm on OlIr denlocTacy. The Framers of the Constitution foresaw that possibility, and acted to prevent that harm . ..). The Erllolulllcnts Clauses arc two critical, closely related anti-corruption prO\isions aimed at ensuring that the President faithfully serves lite jleojl/e, free from the distorting or compromising indi,idual by foreign nations, their leaders, states in the Union, Congress, or other parts of the federal government. They ensure that Atncricans effects of financial inducements prO\ided do not ha\"e to guess whether a President who orders their SOilS and daughters to die in foreign lands acts out of concern for his pt;\"atc business interests; they do not ha\"e to wonder if they lost their job due to trade negotiations in which the President has a personal stake; and they never have to question whether the President can sit across the bargaining foreign leaders and faithfully represent the world's most powerful democracy, table from unencumbered by fear of harming his own cOlnpanies. 6. entanglements "'ith respect to the Foreign Emoluments between American Clause, the Framers were aware that oflicials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious 2 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 6 of 48 threat to the Repuhlic. The theory underlying the clause, informed by English history and by the Framers' experience, is that a /Cderal officeholder who recei,'es something of\'alue from a foreign government can be imperceptibly induced to compromise what the Constitution insists be his only loyalty: the best interest of the United States of America. And rather than address such corruption by punishing it after the filct, the Framers concluded \\'lite a strict prophylactic incenti,'es Trump's rule into the Constitution ne\'er undo this important safeguard that the best solution was to itself, thereby guaranteeing of American autonomy. that improper Applied to President di\'erse dealings, the text and purpose of the clause speak as one: absent the consent of Congress, pri,'ate enrichment through the receipt of benefits li'om foreign go\'ernments is prohibited.' 7. The Domestic Emoluments from corruption. The Founders intended the elause to sen'e as a guarantee parts of the federal go\'ernment, operating Clause was also designed to protect the go\'ernment on his necessities, that Con" ..•. other ess, and the states "can neither weaken [the President's] fortitude by nor corrupt his integlity by appealing to his a\'al;ce."2 The Framers further intended the elause to protect against self-dealing by ensuring that the President's sen'ice is "remunerated only 8. Emoluments by the compensation Relatedly, fixed in advance and' in ways particularly by Congress. important to the plaintiffs, the Domestic Clause shields the states and the District of Columbia from undue pressure to ,,"orman L. Eisen, Richard Painter & Laurence H. Tribe, The Emoluments Clause: Its Text, Meaning. and Application to Donald]. Tmmp (Dec. 16, 2016), http://brook.gsl2hGI~lbW; see also Applieabiliry of Emoluments Clause to Emplopnent of GO\'ernment Employees by Foreign Public Universities, 18 Op. O.L.C. 13, 18 (1994) ("Those who hold offices under the United States must gi\'e the go\'ernment their unclouded judgment and their uncompromised loyalty. That judgment might be biased, and that loyalty di,'ided, if they received financial benefits from a foreign go\'ernmenl. "). The Federalist No. 73 (Alexander Hamilton). 3 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 7 of 48 prm;de emoluments to the President, and protects them from reprisal for any refusal to do so. In a similar vein, the prm'ision safeguards the states and the District li'OJllunfair acl\'antages certain slates may er~oy fi'om opportunities to curry favor (i'om the President by pro\iding emoluments that other states lack. 9. President Trump, both the Foreign Emoluments acting through compames he owns or controls, has \;olated Clause and tbe Domestic Emoluments millions of dollars in pa)l11ents, benefits, and other valuable gm'ernments and persons gmTrnments. consideration His reJleated, ongoing \'iolations include remuneration from foreign acting on their behalf, as well as. federal agencies and state Trump properties held by foreign-government-owned condominiums Clause by reeel\1ng derived from: (a) leases of entities; (b) purchase and ownership of in Trump properties hy foreign governments or foreign-government-controlled entities; (c) other property interests or business dealings tied to foreign governments; (d) hotel accommodations, restaurant purchases, the use of sen'ices and goods by foreign governments domestic and international properties \'ClllIe'S for C\'ellts, and purchases of other and diplomats at hotels, restaurants, owned, operated. and other or licensed by President Trump; (c) continuation of the General Sen'iees Administration lease for President Trump's \Vashington, D.C. hotel despite his hreaeh of the lease's terms, and potential prm;sion of federal tax credits in connection broadcasters with the same property; related to rebroadcasts and (D payments from forcign.governmcnt-owned and foreigtl versions of the tele\'ision program "The Apprentice" and its spinoffs. ~Ioreover, President Trump, by asserting that he ,,;11 maintain the interests at issue, is poised to engage in sinlilar constitutional violations for the duration of his presidency. 10. These present and continuing violations of the Constitution!s anti-corruption protections threaten the free and independent self-govemanee at the core of our democracy. The 4 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 8 of 48 President is making decisions eyery day with profound and far-reaching from determining abandon effeets on Amelican life, who can trayel into the country to deciding whether the United States "ill global efforts to combat climate change; from proposing budgets to oyerseeing the federal workforce; from eyaluating who "ill pay more in taxes to choosing how people will access health carc. Yet Americans are left uncertain as to whether these decisions, \\ith their sweeping impact on foreign and domestic poliey, arc driycn solely by unyielding loyalty to the conntry's best interests. or rather are affected by sclf:intercsted 111oti\"ations grounded in the international and dmnestic business dealings in which President Tnlmp's personal fortune is at stake. II. The President's \iolations of the Emoluments American people are entitled to haw in their goyernmenl. goyernance Clauses undermine It is fundamental that our dnly cleeted Presidents and the goycrnments the trust the to our system of self- oyer which they preside will always act in singular pursuit of our liberty, security, health, and well-being. President Trump's mytiad international and domestic business entanglements make him yulncrablc to corrupt influence and depriye the Ameriean people of trust in their chief executiye's undiyided loyalty. 12. The District and Maryland haye compelling interests in ensuring that the Foreign and Dornestic Emoluments Clauses arc enforced and protect their residents as designed. The President's disregard for these constitutional constraints has resulted in significant and ongoing harm to the District and to l\laryland. 13. The District and Maryland have other sovereign, quasi-sovereign, interests in preventing the defendant's organization, \iolations of the Emoluments and proprietary Clauses. The defendant, his and its afliliates have received presents or emoluments froIll foreign states and federal agencies, and state and local governments in the form of payments instrumentalities to the defendant's hotels, restaurants, as President to boost this patronage and other properties. The defendant of his enterprises, 5 Of has used his position and foreign diplomats and other public Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 9 of 48 ollicials have made clear that the defendant's position as President increases the likelihood that they will frequent his properties and businesses, 1+, The defendant's ongoing constitutional so\'Creign interests of the District and l\lal)'land, violations haml the sovereign and quasi- l\1al),land has an interest in presen;ng its role as a separate soycreign and securing obseryance of the tenns under which it participates in the federal system, That interest is harmed Clauses, but it carries particular by the defendant's \;olations of both Emoluments foree with respect to the Domestie Emoluments exists (at least in part) for the protection Clause, which of "the United States and any of them," Indeed, as go\.crnment entities with authmity to tax and regulate businesses and real estate, the Disuicl and l\laryland arc harmed by percei\'ed defendant and his extensive alliliated enterprises, other states and go\'ernments the Distrin and l\laryland and/or haw an interest in protecting local competitors, resulting from economic and commercial arc i~ured 15, revenue that Thc OO\'\'S defendant's by decreased \;olations, \;s-a-\ls In addition, and their residents, business, wages, and tips to the defendant l\[aryland to the and his business is itself further injured by the from those violations. ongoing interests of the Distl;et and l\lal).land, their capacity as propl;etors their eeonomies acti\'ily diverted enterprises due to his ongoing constitutional lax or else be placed at a disadvantage that have granted or will grant such special treatment. who, as the defendant's reduction in actual pressure to grant special treatment constitutional \lolations The District and l\laryland also harm the propl;etary suffer direct financial harm in of businesses that compete with the defendant's businesses, to the extent that businesses owned by hinl and/or his affiliated enterprises attract customers and divert them away from businesses that the District and Maryland own, license, or tax, 16, Trump's The District of Columbia \lolations of the Emoluments and l\laryland bring this action to stop President Clauses, As a direct result of those \;olations, 6 the Distl;ct Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 10 of 48 and l\laryland To pre,'ent ha,'e been i'tiured and will continuc to bc injured absent relief from this Court. these injuries, President Trump has ,;olated they request that this Court enter a declaratory the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments judgment that Clauses and an injunction against ,;olating thcse clauses further. II. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 17. The plaintifE arc the District of Columbia and the Stale of~laryland. 18. The District of Columbia sued, and is the local government government. is a municipal corporation for the ten;tory constituting The District is represented General for the District of Columbia. by and through empowered the permanent to sue and be scat of the federal its chief legal ollicer, the Attorney The Attorney General has general charge and conduct of all legal business of the District and all suits initiated by amI against the District and is responsible for upholding the public interest. 19. The State of ~Iaryland State is represented is a sovereign state of the United States of Amel;ea. The by and through its chief legal oflicer, the Attorney General of l\lalyland. has general charge, supen;sion, and direction He of the State's legal business, and acts as legal advisor and representative of all major agencies, boards, comnlissions, and official institutions of state government. The Attorney General's powers and duties include acting on behalf of the State and the people of Mal)-Jand in the federal courts on matters of public concern. 20. The defendant is the President of the United States of America. He is being sued in his ollicial capacity. 21. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction 22. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. ~ 1391(e)(I) because the defendant is "an ollicer ... of the United States ... under 28 U.s.C. ~~ 1331 and 220 I. aCling in his ollicial capacity or under color of legal authoriry," 7 and Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 11 of 48 the District of l\laryland is a 'judicial district" in which "a substantial omIsSIons gI\lng nse to the claim occurred," part of the events or and (in any e\Tnt) where one of "the plaintifl]s] resides. " III. LEGAL BACKGROUND 23. The Foreign Emoluments Clause. The ori",;ns of the Foreign Emoluments Clause go back to at least 1651, when the Dutch broke \\ith traditional European diplomatic clistOlns presents, directly and prohibited their foreign ministers from acccpting indirectly, in any manner or way whatcycr."3 The Fnllncrs thinking by those who drafted state constitutions, crafted the Articles of Confederation, including which contained "any or also had the benefit of earlier Maryland's;' and by those who the clause's predecessor: "[T\lor shall any person holding any oflice of profit or trust under the United States, or any of them, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king. prince, or foreign Statc."S 24. The ForeigIl Emoluments Clause was not included initially at the Constitutional COI1\'cntion, but it was added without dissent at the request of Charles Pinckney, who "urged the necessity of presening foreign l\linisters & other oflicers of the U.S. independent influence."'; EdmundJennings 3 5 John Republic regulation). Randolph confirmed the clause's anti-corruption Bassett l\Ioore, A DZges/ qf Ill/ema/ional UW See Md. Declaration S of external purpose, stating: 651 (1906) (quoting Dutch of Rights of 1776, art. 32 ("That no person ought to hold, at the same time, 1110re than one office of profit, nor ought any person, in public trust, to receive any present from any foreign prince or state, or fi'om the United States, or any of them, ,\;thout the approbation of this State."). of 1781, art. VI, S 5 Articles of Confederation ,; 2 Farrand, 711e Records qf/he Federal Convention qf 1787, at 389. 8 I. Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 12 of 48 "It was thought proper, in order to exclude corruption in office from recei\;ng or holding and foreign inOuence, to prohibit anyone any emoluments recognized the perils of foreign inOuence and corruption, fi'om foreign states,") The Framers e\'en in situations subtler than quid Ilro quo bribery, and they therefore created a hroad constitutional prophylactic rule applicable to anything of value gin~n by any foreign go\'ernment to anyone holding an "Omee of Profit or Trust under the United States." including the President. 25, properly Consistent interpreted \\;th the intent of the Framers, to coyer monetary or nonmonetary the Foreign Emoluments transactions, clause bars the receipt of both a "present" and an "Emolument," of value, including "ithout limitation payments, transactions Clause is Indeed, the text of the which together cover anything granting special treatment, and transactions abo\'e marginal cost. The clause also explicitly bars the receipt of "any present [or] Emolument ... 'if any kind Ilha/rver," emphasizing the breadth of conduct co\'ered under the prOVISIOn. 26. The Foreign Emoluments Clause covers not only transfers of anything of \'alue fforTI a king, prince, or foreign state indi\idually, but also any transfer from instrumentalities or agents of a foreign state, This is in keeping with the considered of \;ew of the Department Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, whose constitutional interpretations arc instructive, though not controlling." 27. The Domestic Emoluments the system of patronage, influence, Clause. The Framers also intended and rent-extraction gO\'CrIlors' ollices through a Domestic Emoluments 3 Farrand, that predominated to prevent in the colonial Clause apply;ng to just the President. The The Records 'if/he Federal Convention 'if 1787, at 327. B Applicability of the Emoluments Clause and the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act to the President's Receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize, 33 01'. O.L.C. 8 (2009). 9 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 13 of 48 clause provides that the President's "Compensation" shall not be increased or decreased, and frol11 the United States, or any of them," during that he may not receive any "other Emolument bis term of onice. The clause tbus works to ensure tbat neitber states nor the federal gon,rnment can '\,"eaken bis fortitude by operating on bis necessities, nor corrupt his integrity by appealing to his a\'ance."9 And because the clause is specifically concerned \\;th the federal go,-enlmcnt as well as the states, it docs not allow for Congress to consent to tbe President's receipt of additional emoluments would beyond his salary. This ban on additional emoluments, ensure that the President illdejJtlldfll(f illtendedfor him kr would ha\'c "no /)e(lU1ia~1' Alexander Hamilton wrote, inducement to renounce or desert Ihe the Constillltioll."10 Furtber, as recognized by judicial aUlhOlities, the ban "addressed the Framers' concern that the President sbould not ba\"C the ability to com'ert his or her onice for profit." 28. making The Domestic Emoluments sure that the nation's Clause relleets the Framers' particular concern about powerful chief executi\'e remains free from distorting and cOlTllpting influences that migbt hinder his ability to faitbfully execute his onice. The clause accordingly proscribes their respecti\'c emoluments instrmnentalitics not only Ii'om states and the federal government, but also and subdivisions. IV. RELEVANT FACTS A. The defendant's Foreign Emoluments Clause violations 29. Following he continues the defendant's bundreds of businesses throughout empire compliscs inauguration, to own and control the world, including hotels and other properties. a multitude of different corporations, 9 The Federalist No. 73 (Alexander Hamilton). III Jd. (emphasis added). 10 His business litnited-liability companies, limited Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 14 of 48 partnerships, and other entities that he owns or controls~ in whole or in part~ operating in the United Stales and at least 20 foreign counlJies." His businesses arc loosely organized under an umbrella consisting of the Trump d/h/a known as the "Trump The Trump Organization Organization," and The Trump Organization, Organization LLC Inc., both of ".hicl, arc owned solely hy him. But his interests also inclode scores of other entities not directly owned by either Trump Organization controls. 12 emity but that he personally owns, OI\'I1Sthrough other entities, and/or The defendant also has several licensing agreements income. Through these entities and agreements, that prOlide continuing 110wsof he personally benefits from husill(:Ss dealini,,"S, and is (and "ill be) enriched by any business in which the entities he owns or controls engage with foreign goycrnments, instrumentalities, and officials. 30. managemem" On January I I, 20 17, the defendant of the Trump Organization as well as a longtime company executive. announced a plan to tum "leadership O\'er to his sons Eric Trump 13 and and Donald Trump Jr., Btu the plan did not include relinquishing ownersili/, of his busincsscs or establishing a blind tnlSt. 31. The defendant continues to own-and be well aware of the acti,ities of-the TrUlUp Organization and othcr corporations, limited-liability companies, limited partnerships, and other entities in which he retains an ownership interest. Although he formed a trust to hold his business assets, he may obtain distributions from his trust at any titTIc. H " ~Iarilyn Geewax & ~daria Hollenhorst, Sorting It Out, NPR (Dec. 5, 2016), http://n.prl2g2xZDP. Tmmp's Businesses And Potential COilf/irls: " U.S. Office of Gov't Ethics, Donald J. Trump, 2016 Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Report (l\1ay 16,2016), http://bil.ly/2gBUwIV. Donald Tl1Imp's News COIiference:Full Tranmipl http://nyti.ms/2jkFUPK. 13 14 Da,id and Video, N.Y. Times Gan. I I, 20 17), Kravitz & Al Shaw, Tmmp Law)'er Cor!fi17nsPresidmt Can Pull jl1olll)' From His II Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 15 of 48 32. The defendant's initially indicated son, Eric Trump (who is also an advisor to the defendant's that he would not communicate interests. E,;C Trump has now ackuowledged, the President on at least a quarterly basis. 33. The defendant \\;th his father concerning trust), his business however, that he will prm'ide business updates to IS has neither sought nor reeeived "Consent of the Congress" with respect to his receipt of presents or emoluments from foreign government officials. entities, or instrUITICn tal itics. The District of Columbia's Trump International Hotel 34. The Trump International Hotel \\'ashington, D.C. is located on Pennsyh'ania A,'enue, N.\\'., just blocks from the White House. The defendant through VaI;OUS 35. International o\\ns and controls this hotel entities. The defendant, through emities he o\\ns, receives payments made to the Trump Hotel by guests \\ho stay in hotel rooms and patrons \\ho use the hotel wnues or other goods or sen;ces ill the hotel. 36. The restaurant BLT Prime is located in the Trump International Hotel. The defendant, through valious husiness entities, owns the restaurant, licenses the name from BLT Prime, and pays BLT Prime to operate the restauranl.'" 3-I. Since the election, the Trump to the diplomatic community. International Hotel has specifically marketed itself On one occasion, barely a \\eek after the election, it held an event Bllsinesses 'l7Ienever He IVallls, ProPublica (Apr. 4, 2017), http://bil.ly/2010~IJC. 15 Jennifer Calfas, Eric Trump Sqys He'll Give Ihe Presidenl QyarlaiJ' VIdales 011 Bllsilless Empire, Fortune (l\Iar. 24, 2017), hllp:/ /for.tn/2n2~IR.Xa; Maggie Haberman & Glenn Thrush, Tl1Imp Reaches Bf)'ond IVesl WillgJor COllnsel, N.Y. Times (Apr. 22, 2017), http://nyti.ms/2rsFqvk. 16 Jessica Sidman, How DOllald Tl1Im/, Losl His DC Restallrants, \\'ashingtonian 23,2016), http://bit.ly/2htYzq9. 12 (OCI. Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 16 of 48 where it pitched the hotel to about 100 foreign diplomats.'; The hotel also hired a "director of diplomatic sales'! to facilitate business with foreign slates and their diplOinats and agents, Iming the director away from a competing hotel in \\'ashington.'H In addition, the defendant has repeatedly appeared at the hotel since his election, 38. adding further media attention to the property and raising its public profile. Se\'eralligures administration, Administrator 39. the Trump including Treasury Secretary Steve l\lnuchin Linda !\Ic:\Iahon, in his and Small Business Administration have also lived or continue to live in the hotel.'" Diplomats and their agems hm'e \'oiced their intem to stay at (or hold e\"ems at) International Eastern diplomat" HOlel. "Believe me, all the delegations will go there," one "l'\liddle told the Washillgloll PO.lIabout the hOleP" An "Asian diplomat" agreed: "\\'hy wouldn't I stay at his hotel blocks from the \\'hile House, so I can tell the new presidem, 'I IO\-c your new hotel!' Isn't it rude to come to his city and say. 'I am sta)ing at your 40. c0I11petitor?""2\ These statements have become reality. The Embassy of Kuwait, a foreign state, held its National Upon information Day celebration at the Tmmp International H,;tel on Februal)' 22, 2017.22 and belief, Kuwait paid for the \'enue, food, and olher sen ices prO\ided in , " jonathan O'Connell & Mary jordan, Wash. Post (Nov. 18,2016), http://wapo.st/2qukIgh. 18 For foreign diplolllats, TnJlII/) hotel is place 10 be, /d. '9 julie Bykowicz, TnJlII/) Holel JIa)' be Political Capilal '!fthe o\'alioll'.I Ca/)ital, Associated Press (:\Iar. 5, 2017), http://apne.ws/2n2Rxfs. 20 Id. 21 ld. 22 jonathan O'Connell, Kuwaiti Elllbm.!)' is latest 10 book T17IIIIpD.C. hole~ but alllbmsador .I,!ys he Jell '110pressure', Wash. Post (Dec. 20, 2016), http://wapo.st/2p!\Itw21 ; jackie Northam, Kuwail Celebratioll AI T17I1II/) Hotel Raises COllflict '!f IlIleresl Questions, NPR (Feb. 25, 20 17), http://n.pr/2IavPoB. 13 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 17 of 48 connection \\ith the celebration. The cost has been estimated at 540,000 to 560,000.23 Before the election, a "sa\"c the date" reservation event had pre\iously had been made with the Four Seasons been held'"' According to one report, the Embassy of Kuwait mO\'ed the ,,,'ent nnder pressure from the Trump Organization (though Knwait's ambassador States denied being pressured).25 As a result, the Trump entities hm"c rerci\"cd ol1e or more payments 41. Bet\\'een January International from Kuwait after 12:01 pm onJanuary 23 and 26, 2017 and dtning February Tmmp Agents of Justiee, Arabia reported parking Hotel. an agent representing pa~ing the hotel $190,272 between Arabia.:?G Some In a Foreign October Upon information Act report filed with the of Saudi for lodging, $78,204 for catering, and 51,568 for 31. 2017, using money received were made after the defendant's fi'om Saudi as President.27 inauguration and belief, Saudi Arabia paid at least 5250 per night for each of the rooms it rented through its agent between January 23 and 26, 2017,28 and paid the hotel for meals and 23 Julia Harte, Kuwail could /iI!J' u/) Reuters (Feb, 27, 2017), hnp:/ /reuLrs/20FztKa. 2' of and parking at the the Royal Embassy of the Kingdom I, 2016 and j\lareh of the payments Registration 20, 2017. 2017, the Kingdom of dollars on rooms, catering, International to the United Hotel or its controlling Saudi Arabia~ a foreign Slale, spent thousands Department hotel, where the 10 560,000 for jJar!)' al TrumjJ Hotel ill Washillglon, Jackie Northam, I,uwail Celebration AI TrumjJ Holel Raises COllfliel of IlIleresl Qpesliolls. 25 .Judd Legum & Kira Lerner, Under /IO/itica/ /)re.<.I'ure, hil1""il wncels mqjor a'enls al Four Seasons, swilches 10 TnllnjJ's D. C. hOlel, ThinkProgress (Dec. 19, 2016), http://biLly/2rssRzj\1. 26 j\lSLGROUP Americas Inc, d/b/a Qor"is j\JSLGROUP, Supplemental Statement Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for six month peliod ending 3/31/2017, filed j\lay 31,2017, http://bit.lyl2rAQjgE; Chuck Ross, Saudis SjJenl S270K AI TrumjJ Holel III l.J)b~)'ing Cam/migll Againsl 9/11 Bill, Daily Caller (June 4, 2017), http://bit.ly/2sSKB7F, 27 Byron Tau & Rebecca Ballhaus, TmmjJ Holel Received S270,000 From l.J)b~)'ing Cam/Jail,ql Tied 10 Saudis, Wall Street Journal (June 6, 2017), http://on.\\'~j.coll1/2s42HH9. 28 Isaac Arnsclorf, Saudis fool lab al TrumjJ hole!, POLITICO 14 (Feb, 9, 2017), Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 18 of 48 other sen ices pro,'ided dinner in connection at the hotel on January information with the stay. Saudi Arabia paid for indi,iduals 23 and both breakfilst and dinner on January to ha,'e 24.29 Upon and belief, at least one of the meals was prO\ided by BLT P,ime. Upon information and belief, Saudi Arabia paid the hotel through its agent for similar expenses associated "ith a "isit in mid-February.3o As a result, the Trump International Hotel or its controlling entities ha,'e receiw.d one or more payments from Saudi Arabia, through its agent, after 12:0 I pm onJanuary 20,2017. 42. Representati,'e On or about April 6, 2017, Kaha Imnadze, the Ambassador of Georgia to the United 1\'ations. stayed at the Trump then tweeted his compliments about the hotel.31 Upon information and Permanent International Hotel and and belief, the goyernment of Georgia, a foreign state, paid the hotel for his room and other seniees prO\ided in connection with his stay. As a result, the Trump International Hotel or its controlling entities ha,'e recei,'eel one or more payments from Geor[.,..;aafter 12:01 pm onJanuary 43. International On information 20,2017. and belief, after 12:01 pm on January 20, 2017, the Trump Hotel or its controlling entities ha,'e recei,'ed and "ill continue to recei,'e payments from other foreign states, instrumentalities of foreign states, or foreign officials. 44. OnJanuary in which the Trump 20, 2017, Trump Old Post OfIice LLC, the entity leasing the building International Hotel is loeated and in which the defendant has a beneficial http://politi.co/2kZa6mS. 29 Operations Order from Jason E. Johns, President of 1\'MLB Veterans Ad,'ocacy Group, to fly-In Veterans regarding the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act Oan. 23-26, 201 7), http://bit.ly /20iHdIp. ~~o Ross, Saudis Sjlent S270K AI Trump Holel 31 Kaha http://bit.lyl2oiF8Fd. Imnadze (@kahaimnadze), 15 /11 Lobb;'illg Campaign Against 9/11 Bill. T"itter (Apr. 6, 2017, 8:49 A;..1), Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 19 of 48 interest, amended its governing agreement to pro\'ide that, during the defendant's presidency, the company \l"ill not make any distributions of profits to any entity in \l"hich the defendant has a beneficial interest and will credit these undistributcd profits to an unrccovered capital contribution account held for the benefit of the designated entities that defendant controls. This amendment is immaterial Clause. The defendant LLC (the remaining amounts to \l"hether the defendant has \'iolated remains owner of approximately 77.5% of the Trump from those amounts 45. Emoluments Old Post Office shares arc owned by three of his children), and thereby benefits from any deposited into the unrecO\'ered capital contribution disttibution the Foreign Additionally, once he is no longer in by prO\iding account. He further may reeei\'e office. that the defendant's contributions Trump Old Post Ollice LLC for business purposes, the amendment "ill be used by increased the value of one of his assets. 46. Plior to taking omee, President Trump's fi'om foreign gO\'erIunents would be donated later admitted, governments, attorney promised that all profits earned to the U.S. Treasury. hO\l"e\'er, that it was not tracking all payments and that The Trump Organization that it received from foreign it plans only to estituatc, rather than calculate, such paynlcnts.32 New York's Trump Tower 47. Through Trump Tower is a mixed-use skyscraper on Fifth Avenue in New York City. the use of various entities, the defendal1l owns and controls Trump Tower and, through entities he owns, receives payments Blade to Trump Tower by tenants. Ari :\lelber, et aI., Trump Failing to Track Foreign Cash al His Holels, NBC Ke\l"s (:\lay 24,2017), http://nbcnews.to/2qWzv3x. 32 16 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 20 of 48 48. One of the largest tenallls of Trump Tower is the Industrial Rank of China ("ICRC"), which is a Chinese majOlity-state-owned elllerprise.'" and Commercial As such, ICBC is an instrumentality of a foreign slate. 49. After 12:01 pm onJanuary received one or more paymcllls 20, 2017, Trump Tower or its com rolling entities have from ICBC under its lease. Trump To\\'er or its controlling entities will eontinue to reeei\"C regular payments from ICBC under its lease agreement. 50. The defend am has repeatedly discussing his \ie\\'s of U.S.-China referenced ICRC's Trump Tower lease in relations. DUling his presidential campaign in June 2015, for instance, the defendam stated: "I 100'e China! The biggest bank in the world is from China. You know where their United States headquaners is located? In this building, in Trump Tower."3' Similarly, in :\Iarch 2016, when asked about China's territorial claims in the South China Sea, the defendant told the Washington Post, "I do deals with them all the time. The largest bank in the world, 400 million customers, is a tcnant nfmine in New York, in 11anhattan."35 51. The term ofICBC's of the defendam's occur while he is 52. Trump Tower lease runs umil October 2019, before the end term. As a result, any negotiations for a renewal or extension of the lease will sCfying as President. 36 Trump Grill is a restaurant located inside Trump Tower that the defendant owns through various business entities. Upon information and belief, tenants of Trump Tower, including ollicials of China and other countries, have dined at Trump Grill as a result of their 33 Caleb Melby, et aI., 1l7/en Chinese Bank's Tn/lIlj' Lease Ends, Potential Corif/ict Begins, Bloomberg (Nov. 28, 2016), https://bloom.bg/20Q07T4. 34 Id. 35 Id. 36 ld. 17 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 21 of 48 tenancy 111 the Tower and the foreign states themselvcs may host e,'ents there, Accordingly, foreign states or their instmmentalities The defendant likely have paid or will pay for sen;ees has and ,,;11 continue to receive payments at Trump GrilL from "al;OUS foreign states through Trump GrilL New York's Trump World Tower 53, Trump \\'orld Towcr is a skyscraper on United Nations Plaza in Kew York Cit~" containing condominium controls Trump \\'orld residents of the Trump units, Through Tower the usc of various entities, the dcfendant manages and and, through \\' orld Towcr entities he owns, receives payments lor common charges and handles made by rental transactions in\'ohing condorninium units. 54, In 200 I, the Kingdom Trump \\'orld TowerY of Saudi Arabia paid S4,5 million to purchase a floor of The annual common charges for building amenities for the floor totaled 585,585 at the time, As of 2003, the most recent year for which information is publicly available, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia paid monthly common charges of about S7,398-or S88,781 per year. The floor currently belongs to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for use by the Saudi :vlission to the United Nations, which upon information and belief continues to pay COlnmon charges to the defcndant,3" Stephen R. Brown, Donald Tnanj' made millionsfrom Saudi Arabia, bul IrashesHilla,y Clillioll for Saudi dOllaliolls 10 Clinloll Foulldalioll, N,Y, Daily News (Sept. 4, 2016), http://nydn,us/2bNEAq2, 37 38 Id. 18 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 22 of 48 In 2015, the defendant said about Saudi Arabia: "I get along great \\ith all of 55. them. They buy apartments from me." He further noted: "They spend 540 million, 550 million. Am I supposed to dislike them' I like them very much. ":19 56. The Kingdom of 5audi Arabia is a foreign state, and the Saudi :\Iission to the United l'\ations is an instrumentality of a foreign state. In 57. 2002, the Permanent :\Iission of India to the United l\'ations, an instrumentality of a forei,,'!l state, paid 55.1 million to purchase two units in Trump World Tower from the defendant."O As of 2003, the most recent year for which infortnation 'l\'ailable, the I\lission paid monthly common charges of approximately 53,63g-or is publicly 543,670 per year. The units continue to belong to the :\1ission, which upon information and belief continues to pay common charges to the defcndant. In 2009, the Permanent 58. instrumentality Towcr:" :\Iission of Afghanistan to the United l\'ations, an of a foreign state, paid 54.235 million to purchase a unit in Tmmp As of 2003. the most recent year for which information World is publiely a\'ailabJe, the common monthly charges for the unit purchased by the :\Iission were approximately 52,090 per month-or 525,085 per year. The unit continues to belong to the :\lission, which upon information and belief continues to pay common charges to the defendant. 59. In 2004, the Permanent :\Iission of Q'ltar to the United l\'ations, an instrumentality of a foreign state, paid 51,995,000 to purchase a unit in Trump \Vorld To\\'er, 39 Id. N".Y.C. Dep't of Finance, Office of the City Registrar, Condo. Unit Deed: 845 U.l\'. Ltd. P'ship To The Permanent !\Iission of India to the U.N. (Dec. 23, 2002), http:// on.nyc.gov/2pb80bx. "0 "' !\lax Abelson, •. fj;hanistan B'9's $4.2 AI. Tmlll/' Condo (with 'Peacq,liness and Views'), ! Observer (Sept. II, 2009), http://bit.!y 120Q74n3. 19 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 23 of 48 and in 2012, it paid 58.375 million to purchase two additional units in Trump World Tower. As of 2003, the most recelll year for which information charges for the units purchased is publicly a\'ailable, the common monthly by tbe l\Iission were a total of approximately month-or 567,920 information and belief still pays common charges to the defendant. 60. per year. The The defendant, units continue through to bclong to the ~Iission, 55,660 per entities he owns, recei\'es payments whicb upon made to Trump World Tower by tenants and owners of units in the building through their payment of common charges and other fees. On information and bclief, these payments include management and other fees paid to the building's managcrnent company, an entity owned by the defendant. 61. common Trump cha;ge World Tower or its controlling payments from Saudi Arabia, entities will continue India, Afghanistan, to recei\'c regular and Qatar, and those payments "ill flow to the defendant. 62. The World Bar is a bar located in Trump World Tower. 63. Tenants of the Trump \\'orld Tower, including oflicials from Saudi Arabia, India, Afghanistan, and Qatar ha\'e patronized (or will patronize) the World Bar. Further, foreign states or agents or instrumentalities of these or other foreign states have hosted and will host events at the \\'orld Bar due to its location near the United Nations. By reason of his financial stake in Trump \\'orld Tower, the defendant "ill either recei\'e pay,nents from foreign states made to the World Bar, or the re\'enue that the World Bar recei,'es, including from foreign states, allccts the amount of rent that the defendant is able to charge the \\'orld Bar. Chinese trademarks 6+. The defendant name in connection the Trademark began to seek trademark "ith building construction Office, and he subsequently protection III China for the usc of his sef\ices in 2006. His application was rejected by lost his appeals to the Trademark 20 Review and Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 24 of 48 Adjudication Board, the Beijing Intermediate People's Court, and the Beijing High People's CourLI1 The defendant suflered his most recent court defeat in ~(ay 2015, the month before he declared his candidacy for President. 65. Three weeks after his election, on December 2, 20 I6, the defendant spoke directly with Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen.43 That conversation suggested that the defendant might end the "One China" hruke longstanding proweol and policy that the United States had observed for decades. The defendant further indicated before taking ollice that he might end the One China policy unless some henefit were recei'Td in exchange.H 66. Jinping On February 9, 20 I 7, however, the defendant and pledged to honor the One China policy." spoke with Chinese President Xi Fi,'e days later, on February 14,2017, China re,'ersed its prior course and gave the defendant trademark protection. 67. Chinese Balnc orleaders 68. law prohibits awarding tradclnarks of national, regional, or international that arc "the same as or sitnilar 10 the political organizations.'"'fl Even though China had denied the defendant trademark protection for more than ten years, including in a ruling from an appellate eourt, and despite Chinese law barring the use of foreign leaders' names as tradCInarks, China reversed course and decided to grant the defendant the trademark he had sought and valued. But China did so only after he had been 42 Erika Kinetz, Wilh Tmml"s will Press (Feb. 14,2017), http://apne.ws/2mfcK9:\'. ill Chilla, will Tmmp loilels gel flushed? Associated H Jordan Fabian & ~eetzan Zimmerman, leader, The Hill (Dec. 2, 2016), http://bit.!y/2prWnYu. Tmml' makes hisloT)' wilh I,holle call 10 Taiwall Jordan Fabian & Evelyn Rupert, Tmml' promises Chillese presidelll he'll hOllor 'olle Chilla' policy, The Hill (Feb. 9, 2017), http://bit.ly/2pbgZUW; Laurel Raymond & Judd Legum, Tnllllf/s lrademark lesls Chinese law, Think Progress (Feb. 18, 20 I 7), http://bit.!y /2pXHZTZ. H Fabian & Rupert, T mmp promi<es Chillese presidelll he'll hOllor 'aile Chillo'llOliC)'. 46 Raymond & Legum, Tmml"s lrademark lesls Chillese law. 21 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 25 of 48 elected President, questioncd the One China policy, was sworn in, and then re-afJinned the One China policy. 69. Organization The trademarks have considerable because they gl\"e the Trump the sole right to profit from the Trump brand in China. China's granting of these trademarks constitutes a present or emolument 70, \'alue \\'hen asked why the defendant provided to the defendant. changed his position on the One China policy, and whether he had recei\'ed something in exchange from China, White House Press Secretary Scan Spicer answered: ''The President always gets something," but did not elaborate." International versions and distribution of "The Apprentice" and its spiiloffs 71. The defendant carns royalties and other payments from the distribution countries of the tcle\;sion program Apprentice" "The Apprentice" and "The New Celebrity Apprentice," and also from international in other and its spinons (including "Thc Celebrity for which he is still an executive producer), versions. of the programs produced in other eoumries. In some instances, these payments originate from foreign governments or their agents or instrumentalities. For instance, the defendam is paid for a \'ersion of the program "The Apprentice" United Kingdom.'. The network that broadcasts United Kingdom is an instrumemality 72. "The Apprentice" that airs in the and spinoff shows in the ofa foreign state. After 12;01 pm onJanuary 20, 2017, the defendant has recei\"Cd and will continue to rccch'e payments from foreign states via their payments for "The Apprentice" or its spinofTs 47 l\!adcline Conway, Spicer on Trump's 'One China' agreement: 'The president always gets something', POLITICO (Feb. 27, 2017), http://po1iti.co/2prZpfi. '8 wladcline Berg, Here's How Milch Donald TrumjJ Will Aam From I~'odllring 'Celebrit)" Apprentice', Forbes (Dec. 13, 2016), http://bit.ly/2p YOS9h. 22 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 26 of 48 and international \'ersions. Such payments constitute presents or emoluments that the defendant has accepted and will accept from a foreign state. Other foreign connections, properties, and businesses 73. U"ited Arab Emirates. The defendant's company is engaged in several real- estate projects in the United Arab Emirates, including Dubai's Trump \\'hich opened on February 18, 2017.''1 Upon infonnation thereby possesses a financial interest in the Trump International discretion Golf Club, and bclief, the defendant, \.arious business entities, has a branding-and-managerncnt i4. International through contract \\;th the property, and Golf Club. All services for the golf club, including electricity, water, and roads, "come at the of the government," and the "club's bar will need gm'ernment approvals to serve alcohol, not to mention other regulatory issues.~'5(l 75. The golf club and other projects cannot be built or operated utility, and other senices and approvals. These discretionary on the defendant, apprm'als accordingly confer value through his financial stake in the company recei\ ing them, in violation of the Foreign Emoluments 76. without pennits, Clause. Indonesia. The defendant's company is engaged in at least two real-estate projects in Indonesia, including redeveloping a resort in Bali.51 Upon information and belief, the 19 Sudarsan Raghavan, Tmm!"s SOilSgel red earlJeI IrealmCIIIal Dubai golf club ol,ming, Wash. Post (Feb. 18,2017), http;!/wapo.stl2pY20tL. sn Jon Gambrell, 2017), http://apne.ws/2jOgOVk Golf Club Shows Pi!fall, qf His Presiden!)', Associated . Press (Jan. 3, .\1 Ian Jarrett, Pan Pacific makes w'lyfor Tiump ill Bali, Travel Weekly (Feb. 17, 2017), http://bit.ly/2nU3A1''JN;RichardC.Paddock&EticLipton,Tmmp's !Ildollesia Prqjecls, Still .IIoving Ahead, Crealf PolCIIlial COI!/lic/s, N.\'. Times (Dec. 31, 2016), http://nyti.ms/2kKSKLp; Russ Choma, Tmmp's !Ildollesian Busilless Parlner Brags Aboul His Access, l\Iother Jones (Feb. 10, 20 17), http://hit.ly /2kttiql\'IC. 23 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 27 of 48 defendant, througll business entities, has a licensing-and-Inanagement "cUIOUS agreement ,,'ith these pn:>jects. through which he possesses a financial interest in them. 77. Completing the projects required or ",ill require permits and appro\'als from the Indonesian go,'crnmcnt. The defendant \\ill receive \'aluc from these discretionary permits and apprO\'als through his financial stake in the company recei\;ng them, in \;olation Emoluments 73. Clause. Other. businesses throughout The defendant also owns, operates, or companies associated Emoluments recei\;ng licenses with the owning through other his financial stake in the and operation of those businesses in \;olation Clause. In addition, revenues from foreign states' patronage through numerous them, derives \'alue from the foreign permits and approvals and other businesses may flow to the defendant. defendant, and the United States and abroad, including other hotels, other properties for sale or lease, and golf courses and c1ubs.52 Tbe defendant, company of the Foreign at least one of his vanous received one or more presents or emoluments of the Foreign of his hotels, golf clubs, After 12:0 I pm on January businesses, proJlerties, 20, 20 17, the and other entities has from foreign states and ,,;11 continue to do so. B. The defendant's Domestic Emoluments Clause violations 79. As alleged throughout above, the defendant O\\TIS and controls hundreds of businesses the country, including hotels and other properties. The defendant personally benefits from the business dealings of these entities and agreements associated ,,;th them, and is and ,,;11 be enriched by their business with state go\'Crnments or federal agencies within the scope of the Domestic Emoluments Clause. 52 U.S. Ollice ofCov't Ethics, DonaldJ Trump, 2016 Executi\'e Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Report (~-Iay 16,2016), http://bil.ly/2gBUwIV. 24 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 28 of 48 The District of Columbia's Trump International Hotel 80. primarily On August 5, 2013, Trump by the defendant, Old Post OfTice LLC, a business entity owned signed a GO-year lease "ith the General Seniees ("GSA")-an independent President-to open a hotel in the Old Post OfTice Building in the District of Colnmbia. 81. agency of the United States, whose administrator Administration is appointed by the More than 7G% of Trump Old Post Of lice LLC is owned by which is in turn O\\11ed almost entirely by the Donald J. Trump defendant is the sole heneficiary. The Trump International PJT Holdings LLC, Revocahle Trust, of which the Hotel \\'ashington, D.C. is located at this site. The defendant has not divested his interest in the lease since becoming President. 82. Section 37.19 of the Old Post Ofiice lease states: "No ... Government of the United States ... shall be admined any benefit that may alise therefrom." A \iolation and a default unless it is remedied "ithin defendant elected ofTicial of the to any share or part of this Lease, or to of Section 37.19 is a non-monetary' breach 30 days after notice from the GSA. Accordingly, has been in breach of the lease with the GSA since 12:0 I pm on January the 20, 20 I 7, when he became President. 83. Before the defendant's to Representatives the defendant Elijah Cummings, would be in \iolation interests in the lease" for the Trump the inauguration, Norman acting administrator. the GSA's Deputy Commissioner indicated Peter DeFazio, Gerald Connolly, and Andre Carson that of the lease unless he "fully divests himself of all financial International Hotel, which he has not done. Shortly after Dong, a GSA ofTicial appointed by former President Obama, hecame But less than a day later, the defendant Horne, who had coordinated 53 inauguration, replaced the GSA's transition with the defendant's Isaac Arnsdorf, TnLlIIl) Picks Leader for Federal Agcllq 25 :'vIr. Dong "ith Tim campaign .. 3 \ Overseeing His D. C. Hotel, Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 29 of 48 84. budget Se\'eral weeks later, on ~Iarch increasing 16,2017, the defendant released a proposed 2018 GSA's limding, while cutting all (or ncarly all) other non-defense-related agencies' budgets.54 One week after that, on ~larch 23, the GSA issued a letter stating thatcontrary to the lease's plain terms-Trump Old Post Oflice LLC "is in full compliance Section 37.19 [of the lease] and, accordingly, the lease is valid and in full force and elfect."" significant portion of the letter IT\iews the purported and taxpayers-e\'en 85. governing the business of Trump A financial benefits of the lease to the GSA though those benefits are immatelial Attach cd to the ~larch with to the question of breach. 23, 20 I 7 letter was an amendment Old Post Ollice LLC. This amendment to the agreement is the basis of the GSA's position that the tenant is in eomplianee with the lease, but the letter does not explain how the amendment blings the tenant into compliance. In fact, as described above, the amendment does not prevent the defendant from recei\ing "any benefit" from the lease, and Trump Old Post Ollice LLC remains in breach of the lease. 86. In forbearing from enforcing the Old Post Ollice lease's default and ternlination procedures, despite the tenant's breach of its ternlS, and in cooperating with the tenant in attempting to create the appearance giycn the defendant an emolument 87. Additionally, historic-preservation POLITICO of compliance with the lease, the federal gm'ernment has in \iolation of the Domestic Emoluments Clause. the defendant, through tax credit for the Trump entities he owns, is seeking a S32 million Intemational Hotel. Approval of this credit is at Gan. 26, 2017), http://politi.co/2psg!\lfU. 51 Ollice of ~lgmt. & Budget, Exec. Ollice of the President, America First, A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again (2017), http://bit.ly/2J1\jrBO. 55 Letter from Ke\in 1\1. Terry, Contracting Oflicer, United Admin" to DonaldJ Trump,j •..(Mar. 23,2017), http://bit.ly/2nhKf.'lB. 26 States Gen. Sen's. Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 30 of 48 the discretion of the National Park Sen;ce, an instrumemality of the federal goyernment now under the defendant's authm;ty.';'; If approyed, the tax credit would olEet approximately 20";', of the cost of rehabilitating the building in which the Trump Intcrnational Hotel is operating. 88. On NO\Tmber 14,2016, the defendant receiwd appro,'alli'OITI the National Park Seryice for the second phase of the thrce-step-approyal process. If final appro,'al is granted, it may constitute an emolument, in "iolation ufthe Donlcstic Emoluments Clause." Mar-a-Lago Club 89. The Mar-a-Lago Club is a priyate club and estate located in Palm Beach, Florida. It is comprised of 20 acres ofland, \\;th a main mansion of oyer 100 rooms, along with a beach club, pools, tennis courts, aDd a 20,000 square foot hallroom for priyate eyents. The estate itself was purchased by the defendant in 1985. A decade later, in 1995, the defendant opened the club as a hotcl and resort for dues-paling members of the public. It is owned by the defendant directly or owned by entities that he directly controls. 90. The defendant, through entities he owns, recei,'es payments made to the ,,[ar-a- Lago Club by members and guests who join or ,;sit the club, or rent space there, or pay for other goods or sen;ces at the club. 91. Membership in the ;..Iar-a-Lago Club reqUIres payment of an initiation fee of $200,000, plus tax, as well as 514,000 a year in annual dues. This fee was doubled follO\,;ng the defendant's election as President-an increase from $100,000 to 5200,000.51 Since his election, S6 Eric Le';tz, Tmmp It'on the Presidem)', 17lenAPIJToralon a Tax Subsiq)'for His Hotel, New York ;..Iag. (Nov. 30, 2016), http://nym.ag/20FFl09. Robert Frank, Mar-a-Lago Membership Fee Doubles to S200, 000, CNBC Gan. 25, 2017), http://cnb.cxl2kjIc2j. 57 27 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 31 of 48 the defendant has also attempted to capitalize on his office by ad,'ertising his private property to foreign governments and indi\iduals. 92. The State Department United Kingdom and Albania-ha,'e and at least two U.S. Embassies-those promoted the :-Iar-a-Lago located in the estate and club on their respecti,'e websites by posting a 400-word blog post, originally mitten by Leigh Hartman for a State Department-managed 93. website, "Share America," on Apli14, 2017.'" The State Department and embassies' actions h'l\"e ,erwd to promote :-'Iar-a- Lago as the defendant's "Florida estate" and claimed that it "has become well known as the president frequently travels there to work or host foreign leaders."'" 94. The State Department is an executi,'e department within the federal government under the defendant's authority. 95. ShareAmerica, the blog for which the post was originally written, is specifically direrled towards foreign indi,'iduals and gowrnments."o 96. This po,t advertising 1\lar-a-Lago has since been removed from the wehsites of the State Department and the embassies, but not before substanti,'e, world-wide advertising of the defendant's private property, using government resources, had occurred. 97. The defendant has used his official position as President to promote his 1\lar-a- Lago property. He has designated :-Iar-a-Lago as the "\\'inter \\'hite House," and also refers to it :," POLITICO Darren Samuelsohn, Slate Departmfll~ U.S Embassies Promolillg Trump's ,I/ar-a-Lago, (Apr. 24, 2017), http://politi.co/2peC7Jb. Mar-a-Lago: 'He wiT/ler 1l7,ite HOllse, http://bit.Iyl2pa\\'tRK (blog post subsequently remoYCd; fanner blog post shown at Dan Merica, Stale DejJartmfTll removes .\lar-a-Lago blDgposl, CNN (Apr. 25, 2017), hllp:/ / enn.it/2pdRu2x). 59 60 About Us, ShareAmerica, IlItps:/ /share.america.gov/about-us/ 20 I 7). 28 (last visited June 9, Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 32 of 48 as the "Southern White House."'iI Since taking office, he has \;sited l\lar-a-Lago on at least seyen occasions, and has met with a number of foreign leaders there, including Japanese Prime l\linister Shinzo Ahe and the President of the People's Repuhlic of China, Xijinping62 98, Upon information and belief, federal, state, and local goyernments, or their instrumentalities, ha\'c nlade and \\;11continue to make paynlcnts for the use of facilities owned or operated by the defendant for a yariety of functions, The defendant will recei\'e a portion of those payments, which constitute emoluments prohihited by lhe Domestic Emoluments Clause. 99. Although the exact extent of these emoluments is not currently known, examples of current or potential \;olations include "public pension funds in at least se\'en U.S. states"-blll not the State of l\laryland an im'estment or the District of Columbia-that "haye im'ested millions of dollars in fund that owns a New York hotel and pays one of President Donald Trump's companies to run it, according to a Reuters rc\;ew of public records."63 And the defendant has 61 See, e.g., Press Briefing by Press Secretary Scan Spicer (Feb. 2, 2017) ("Luckily, for those of you who are going to be joining the President down to ~lOl;da this weekend, you'll get some lime to get a glimpse of summer at the '\\'inter \\'hile House' in I\lar-a-Lago."), http://bit.ly/2k5Q3IZ; Remarks by President Trump in Listening Session \\;th the National Association of :\Ianufacturers (:\Iar. 31, 20 I 7) ("The President: ... As you know the President of China is coming to FJOI;da. We're ha\;ng a meeting-big meeting-at I\lar-a-Lago. We call it the Southern \Vhite House, which it actually is. It was originally built as the Southern \\'hite House, a 101of people don't know."), http://bitJy/2rUHOZL 62 See Background Briefing by Senior Administration Officials on the Visit of President Xi jinping of the People's Republic of China (Apr. 4, 2017) ("SENIOR ADI\IINISTRATION OH1CIAL: I'm certain it was President Trump's imitation thaI they meet outside onVashington, D.C.you know, you\'e heard people refer to it as the '\\;nter \\'hite House.' It's a place where he fecls comfortable and at home, and where he can break the icc with Xi jinping \\;thout the formality, really, of a Washington meet-up."), http://bitJy I2n VQy26. 63 julia Harte, Exclusive: A New link holf! deal shows how some public j>ensionji11lds help to enrich Tmmp, Reuters (Apr. 26, 2017), http://reut.rs/20IONEp. 29 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 33 of 48 recei,'ed (or will likely reeei,'e) a host of other potemial emolumems from fcdcral, statc, and/or local governments. C. Post-inauguration premium for the defendant's goods and services 100. Sincc the dcfendam's inauguration as President, goods and scr"ices sold hy his ,'mious Trump husincsscs ha,'e sold at a premium. Thc dcfcndant's brand greater prominence thc potcntial 10 prmidc) and exposure. high officc !,>i,'esthc Trump ~lorco\'cr, these goods and senices pro\'idc (or ha\"c a unique bcncfit: access to, influence on, and the goodwill of the President of thc United States. J 0 I. Thus, for example, the starting rate for "guest rooms" at the defendam's Office hotel increased 10 Old Post 5500 on most nights, up hundreds of dollars from when the hotel first opened shortly before the defendant's election'"' 102. Further, as discussed earlier, the initiation fee for membership at defendant's l\Iar- a-Lago resort doubled from 5 I00,000 to 5200,000 shortly after he was eleCled'",; D. The plaintiffs' interests in this litigation 103. The plaimifTs' imerests in this litigation are substantial. They arc harmed by the defendant's "ill continue :\laryland's interest constitutional to suffer) harm prmisions the states themselves; in at least two distinct ways. Fin/, they have suffered to their so,'ereign interest in presef\ing in not being constitutional \;olations subjccted and/or quasi-sovereign its rightful status "ithin to unfair competition including our fedcral system; the plaintiffs' by ,irtuc designed to guard against corruption the plaintifis' interest in protecting imerests, and 10 of ongoing ,iolations their ecollOlnies and their residents The Associated Press, T rumj} Hotd Jfqy He Po!itica! Capita! q[ Nation's Fortune (:\lar. 5, 2017), http://for.tn/2rsCsXI. Robert Frank, Mar-a-Lago membershipJee doubles to $200,000. 30 of protect interests distinct to 6' 65 (and frOill Capita!, Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 34 of 48 economic harm; and :\Iaryland's suffered (and ,,;11 continue defendant's interest in preselying its tax revonue, Second, the plaintiffs have to suffer) proprietary ongoing constitutional that the defendant is in \;olation \;olations, and other financial hanns as a result of the These injuries can be redressed by a declaration of the Emoluments Clauses and an injunction preventing his continued \;olation of them, Sovereign and quasi-sovereign injuries to the plaintiffs 10.• , Maryland's sovereign interest in enforcing the tenns agreed to enter the Union. Before adopting the federal Constitution, states were truly independent incorporated protections with specific prohibitions go\'ernments. on public ollicials accepting payments The 1\laryland Declaration and contains precursor a precursor 10 and its sister :\Iaryland-had into their own legal codes and constitutions, from federal, state, or foreign of Rights, adopted AUl,,'llStI.•, 1776, prO\'ides that "all persons invested ,,;th the lq".;slati\'e or exeeUli\'C powers of government public," :\Ial)'land sO\'ereigns. 1\lany of these states-including against public corruption on which it the U.S, Constitution's are the trustees of the Emoluments combines the concerns of the two c1auscs into a single prohibition: Clauses,"" This "That no person ought to hold, at the sanlC tilne, J110rc than one office of profit, nor ought any person, in public trust, to rccei\.c any present from any foreign prince or state, or from the United States, or any of them, ,,;thout pro\idcd the approbation for banishment of this State,""7 The 1\lal)'land "[oreyer" as a potential 66 1\ld. Declaration "7 !d., art. 32. punishment Constitution for a governor of Rights of 1776, art. .• (Aug, 1.•,1776). 31 of 1776 further sharing "directly or Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 35 of 48 indirectly" in the profits of another office, and also prohibited the governor fi'OlTI ecei\ing part of r the profits of supplying the army and nmy,68 I05. l\la~'land's historical consistent \\ith the constitutions Constitution prohibition against forcib'll and domestic cI110lumcnts is adopted by the other colonies at the time, The Pennsyh'ania of 1776, which Benjamin franklin helped draft, made clear "[tJhat gO\'ernment is, or ought to be. instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the people, nation or cOlTImunity; and not for the particular enl0Iun1(~nt or ad\'antagc of any single man, family, or sett of men, who arc a part only of that community"'6!> The South Carolina Constitution and the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780," contained similar prohibitions of 1776,''' against corruption of public oflieials, 106, The prohibitions contained in the Domestic and foreign Emoluments Clauses were thus material inducenlcllts to the states entering the union. As a stale sovereign, l\laryJand retains its power to bling suit to enforce those prohibitions today, 107, compete 68 The plaintiffs' improperly for goven,mental influence interest or favor. in not being compelled As explained above, the to Domestic ~ld. Const. of 1776, arts. 33 and 53. 6!> Const. of Pa" Declaration of the Rights of the Inhabitants of the Commonwealtb or State of Pennsyh'ania, art. V; .lee alw id, at ~ 36 ("As e\Try freeman to preserve his independence, (if without a sufficient estate) ought to ha\'e some profession, calling, trade or farm, whereby he may honestly subsist, there can be no necessity for, nor use in establishing offices of profit, the usual effects of which are dependence and senility unbecoming freemen, in the possessors and expectants; faction, contention, corruption, and dborder among the people. But if any man is called into public seniee; to the prejudice of his-private affairs, he has a right to a reasonable compensation: And whencver an oIliee, through increase of fecs or othendse, becomes so profitable as to occasion many to apply for it, the profits ought to be lessened by the legislature, "). iO S.C. Const. of 1776, art. X. il ~[ass. Const., eh. II, art. XIII. 32 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 36 of 48 Emoluments Clause in particular reflects the Framers' deep concern that one or r110rcof the states (or the federal goyernment) power to their ad,'antage might seck to buy ofT the President so that he would exercise and to the detriment of other states, thercby disrupting the balance of po,,'er in thc federalist system. Thus, thc Domcstie Emoluments Clause aims to preyent "the United States, or any of thcm," from fecling compelled (or being compelled) to conler pt;,'ate financial benefits on the President in order to compcte for inlluence and favor. 108. The District and lIlaryland each hal'e a gm'crnmental interest in thc enforcement of their respective laws regarding taxation, ctl\.iromnental protection, zoning, and land use as they relatc to real propcrty that the defendant or the "Trump Organization" may own or seek to acquire. The defendant and his afJiliated enterprises ha,'e a large and expanding portfolio of realestate holdings, including Realty, othem;se a hotcl in the District, and the defendant's known as 'I' International Trump International Realty LLC, is registered to conduct business in lIlmy'land,72 109. requirements Real-estate acquisition, ownership, and development implicate a range of legal under the laws of the District and :'-Ialy'land, including tax laws that generate revenue for the District, :'-Iaryland, and their instrumentalities. The defendant has boasted that he has achieved success in real-estate acquisition and development by using his financial clout and political connections to extract from governments waivers, and variances ,\;th maximum concessions, respect to taxes and other requirements 72 :'-Id. State Dep't of Assessments and Taxation, for Trump International Realty, http://bit.ly/2qXZWpQ exemptions, inlposcd by 1aw.73 :'-Id. Business Express, Registration 73 Geraldine Baum, Tom Hamburger & Michael j. :\Iishak, Trump has thrived with gnve771mfllt'sgenernsi{r, L.A. Times (May II, 2011), http://lat.ms/ I UG:'-ltc8;jillian Kay Melchior, Donald Trump Has Mastered the Art '!f the Tax Break, National Review (Aug. 19, 2015) ("Trump has long sought subsidies, tax breaks, and other preferential treatment from the govcrnment."), 33 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 37 of 48 Indications to date suggest that this longstanding cease upon the defendant's defendant's ascendancy to the highest office in the land has enhanced his organization's ability to I 10. governments with respect to his properties. i-l The defendant's the Constitution potentially protection, placed at a disad,.antage I I I. including lost re'.enue of or (2) deny such requests and be Either "ay, the result is the ,"Cry type of injury that the Domestic of federal government "hich rank tirst and fourth, respectiwly, expenditures, are particularly decisions that are subject to the corrupting Federal funds make up approximately 7-1 enforcement ,.is-il-\;s slates and other gO\.ernment entities that have granted or ,,;11 ~loreO\.er, the District and l\laryland, resulting from budgeta". http://bit.ly and compromised Clause "as designed to prevent. per capita amount ~la".land in violation of "ith an intolerable dilemma: either (I) grant zoning, and land use regulations, agree to such concessions. Emoluments or receipt of presents and emoluments fequests for concessions, exemptions, wai,"crs, variances, and the like and sufler the consequences, em.ironmental acceptance presents the District and ;\la".land the Organization~s rather, did not that the {i"OIll to the Presidency; Organization there is e,;dence \\;n concessions election practice of the Trump 25% of the District's in susceptible to inju". influence of emoluments.75 fiscal year 2018 budget,'6 is rely;ng on federal lunds for nearly 30% of the State government's and budget for fiscal I Irher3Y. 1\,1ichacl LaForgia & Steve Erler, ll'71f1l 77wl FeisfJ'jYeighboT Becomes the President, N.Y. Times (~Iay 6, 2017), http://nyti.ms/2qXUxP,,. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 20 II) at 23, 32, http://bit.ly 12r6mJRe. 7.\ Consolidated Federal Funds Reportfor Fiscal Year 2010 (Sept. 76 Council of the District of Columbia, Committee of the Whole, Re/)ort on Bill 22241, tIze "Fiscal Year 2018 Federal Portion Budget Request Act rf 2017" (May 30, 2017) at 2, http://bit.!y 12s0x6Fz. 34 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 38 of 48 year 2018." Federal gOyernmelll spending accounted domestic product and more than 28% of ~laryland's ~Iaryland are home to headquarters approximately (,", more than 42% of the District's gross in fiscal year 2014.'8 Both the District and for federal agencies. 17% of the workforce in the District 79 Ci,ilian federal agencies employ and 10% of 1\laryland's total work.f,)rceHO Federal agencies annually haye spelll more than 521 billion for procurement more than government 526 billion for procurement spending in ~laryland81 and operatioI1s~ and the President's Gi\'Cn this significance significant 112. as governments I 13. of federal role in detennining when, and where federal funds arc spent, the connict of interest inherent receipt of emoluments in the District and how, in the defendant's directly and profoundly alrects the District and ~Iaryland. The plaintiffs seek to protect this distinct illlerest, and thereby ,indicate in our constitutional The plaintiffs' their role SChCI11C. interest in preventing econonric injury to their residents and their eCOJlOnries,The District is home to 680,000 residents, while the State of ~Iaryland is home to o\'Cr 6. I ntillion residents. Residents ofbuth the District and ~laryland thri,ing participate in a hospitality industry that comprises a substalllial part of the plaintiffs' economics. For " ~Id. Dept. of Legislati,'e Sen ices, 171e 90 Dqr RelJort: A Review qf the 2017 Legislative Session at A-3, A-28, http://bit.ly/2r6gIEs. 78 Pew Charitable Trusts, Issue Bride Federal S/lfnding in the States 2005 10 2014 (~Iar. 3, 2016) at 6, http://bit.ly / I QIOq43. 79 Office of Personnel ~lanagcment, Data, Analysis & Documentation: Federal Employment Reports (Sept. 2015), http://bit.ly/2qZWcRE; District of Columbia, Wage and Salary Employment by Industry and Place of Work (Dec. 2015), http://bit.ly/2raF]hF. 80 John Fritze, Tmmp's Brlt{get Suggests .I1qjor Changes in Md., Baltimore Sun (1\lar. 16, 20 17), http://bsun.mdl2r6nl Yk. 81 U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 2011) at 37, 48, http://bit.ly12r6n1JRe. Consolida/ed Fedaal Funds Reportfor Fiscal Year 2010 (Sept. 35 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 39 of 48 example, in 2014, visitors 10 the District generated approximately 56,81 billion in spending'" and drm'e 53,86 billion in \\'ages83 for 74,570 employees in the District's hospitality industry.''' l\laryland, In lOurists and travelers spent nearly 5 17 billion in 2015, yielding S5,7 billion in \\'ages for more than 140,000 employees,8; including more than 72,000 hospitality industry \\'orkers employed in the t\\'o Maryland counties that border the District of Columbia'"" and :\la!)'land regulate competition and transparency Both the District in this indust!), through la\\'s that prohibit anticompetiti\'c or deceptive practices and protect consumers. 114, Residents of the District and :\la!)'land and emoluments 10 the defendant because arc injured by the payment it tilts the competitive of presents play;ng field to\\'ard his businesses; causes competing companies and their employees to lose business, wages, and tips; and generates a range of market distortions that restrict and curtail opportunity, diminish revenues and earnin,gs, and hanlper competition. lIS, The Distr;ct and l\laryland in providing and presen;ng their residents a b'el are free from ha,'e the authority and right 10 "indicate their intcrest play;ng field in the hospitality indust!)', and in ensuring that the injuries dcfendant's ,;olations of the Emoluments and competitive disad,'antages that Clauses, 82 Office of the Deputy :'vlayor for Planning and Economic Development, alld Tourism, Imps:/ / dmped,dc.gov/page/hospitality-and-tourism. 83 Hos/lila!il)' Id. 84 no\\' from Id. SS l\ld. Tourism Development 4, 20 I 7) at 3, http://bit.ly /2rOk3Ra. Board, Fr 2016 Tourism Deve!o/,menIAllllua! Report Gan. So Md, Dept. of Commerce, MOlltgomery COUllf)',Md,: Erig Ecollomic Facts (2017) at 2, http://bit.ly/2rFHvG2;:\ld, Dept. of Commerce, Prillce Gco~~e's COUllf)',Md,: Erig Ecollomic Facts (2017) at 2, http://bit.ly/2sY6P8e, 36 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 40 of 48 116. ,;olations Maryland's sovere'gn of the Emoluments Clauses interests '" tax The defendant's interest in prcscf\;l1g also il~jurc :\laryland's revenues. tax rc"clluc for the benefit of its residents. For example, National Harbor is a resort development a casillol restaurants, George's cntenainrncnt, County, I\laryland. a malina, Ri,'er in Prince and shops located on the Potomac Although ~[aryland docs not own National with hotels, Harbor, the \'arious hotels and other businesses in the complex generate significant tax revenue for state and local go,'ernnlcnts, through income tax assessed on the businesses and their employees, sales lax, hotel tax, and other taxes and fees. 117. The National entertainment, betwecn Harbor de\'e1opment includes ~IGI\I National shopping, and casino complex that is subject to a Community ~"IGM National LLC, and the government of P,ince George's County, Benefit sets goals I\IG~I National Harbor to hire Prince George's County residents, to contract with im'estment granted opportunities and other businesses located in the County, for County residents, The casino is operated by the ~laryland Lottery and Gaming Control Commission, Agreement a encouraging enterprises Community Benefit Agreement of the business of ~Ial')'land,B7 The a hotel, subdi\'ision minority State Harbor, Harbor, and to create under a gaming license a state go\'crnnlclll entity. Under ~Iaryland law, the state and local gO\'ernments recei\'e 56% of the proceeds generated by ~IGI\I National Harbor's \'ideo lottery tenninals and 20% orthe gross proceeds generated by its table games,"B In the first four months contributed of 2017, I\IG1'v1 i\'ational Harbor's more than 575 million in revenue to state and local go\'ernment casino proceeds treasuries to fund 87 See County Council of Prince George's County, Md" Resolution 1\0, CR-68-20 14 Duly 23, 2014) (apprO\ing Community Benefit Agreement), http://bit.ly/2rotRaS, 88 l\ld, Code Ann" State Gov't ~ 9-IA-27; l\ld, LotteI')' and Gaming Control Agency, Maryland Casinos Generate 5135,7 Million ;n Revenne During April, http://bit.ly /2s8zSsD, 37 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 41 of 48 ,'a,ious public pllll'0ses, including more than S55 million for the State's Education Trust Fund."" Any circlltl1stanre that inlpairs National Harbor's ability to attract diminish the re"enues on which the state and local gm'ernments 118. competitor Trump International of National Harbor's Hotel, located \isilOfS and guests \,ill dcpend. in the District of Columbia, is a direct hotels and othcr businesses, including ~IG~I National Harbor. Those hotels and businesses suffer competitive harm by the defendants' Yiolations, and ~laI)'land's tax caflers, in turn, arc ongoing constitutional dinlinishcd as a rcsult.90 Proprietary and other financial injuries to the plaintiffs The District of Columbia. The Disllict has a financial intcrest in properties, 119. venues, and bther enterprises locatcd within the District as owner. lender, or landlord. 120. Washington The District owns the "'alter E. Washington Com'ention Center. The COIl\'cntion and Sports Authority (also known as Events DC), is an instrumentality of the government of the DislIict of Columbia. in the District, including the Walter E\'ents DC operates event and conference venues E. \Vashington Convention Center, D.C. Armory, and Carnegie Library. 12 I. The District, through E,'ents DC, scrves the diplomatic and state governmcnts by prmiding community and foreign seniecs that compete with those owned or controlled by the defendant or the Trump Organization. 122. In fiscal year 2016, E,'ents DC generatcd over S30 million in revenue from building rental and ancillary charges. A portion of E,'ents DC's revenue is based on demand for the Convention 89 Center, D.C. Armory, and Carnegie Library. Id. "0 Benjamin Frced, AfGAf Sql's lis National Harhor Re.,"r/ Will 'Blow Awa/ Tn/mp's DC Hotel, Washingtonian (Jan. 20, 2016), hllp:/ /bit.ly/2qXV7g6. 38 Donald Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 42 of 48 123. Foundation On August 9, 2016, the Embassy of Colombia partnered with the U.S. Soccer to host an Olympic watch party at the Carnegie Libra". for the soccer match between the U.S. ,,"omen's National team and ColombiaY' 124. On September 6, 2016, the Embassy of T~ikistan celebrated Tajikistan Independence Day at a reception hcld at the Carnegie Libra".'"' 125. As discussed above, Trump International Hotel \Vashington, D.C., specifically markets its hotel rooms, event spacc, and food and be,.erage services to the diplomatic community and foreign gO\.ertu1Jcnts. 126. Thc defcndant, his family, and other members of the defendant's administration ha,.e continued to promote his hotel properties, such as by making multiple appearances at tbose properties, including in connection with oflicial business. 127. Since the defendant's inauguration, foreign governments (including the Embassy of Kuwait and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) h",.e held cvents at the hotel, and public oflicials have stated that, since the defendant was elected president, they are more likely to pay for goods and sen.ices at the defendant's properties in an attempt to curry favor with him. 128. The defendant's Trump International Hotel \\'ashington, defendant or the Trump \\'ashington receipt or acceptance of presents or emoluments Organization through the D.C. and other properties owned or controlled by the has resulted in a competitive injury to the \\'alter E. Convention Center, D.C. Armo"., and Carnegie Library. 91 Olympic Watch Party, US Soccer Foundation website (last visited june 10, 2017), http://bit.ly /2auR..t'1lm. Tqjik IndflJflldence, Washington Diplomat Facebook page (last visitedjune 2017), http://bit.ly/2d\lR3z8. 39 10, Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 43 of 48 129, The District's interest is further injured by the loss of the economic ,'alue of its brands in compaJison to defendant's brand, as foreign and state governments and their agents and instrumentalities favor his businesses for reasons related to the defendant's receipt or acceptance of presents or emoluments. The State of Maryland. 130, ~Iaryland has a proprietary interest m properties, venues. and enterprises that directly compete ,,'ith those o\\'ned or controlled by the defendant or the Trump Organization, competitive advantage Domestic Emoluments 131. Conference ~Ialyland suffers economic loss because its enterprises are placed at a as the result of the defendant's ongoing ,iolations of the Foreign and Clauses, Specifically, ~Iaryland has a dircct financial interest in the i\lomgomcry Center, part of the Bethesda North ~Iarriott Hotel and Conference County Center located in Bethesda, ~Iaryland, The site of the hotel and conference center is o\\'ned by the !\Iontgomery County Re,'enue Authority, a public corporation subdivision of the Statc of ~la,,'land, The County cemer portion of the site to ~10ntgomery instrumentality development Stadium Revcnuc of the conference separate center \\'as funded bonds Authority County and to the ~la,,'land of the State,93 as equal tenams-in-common AuthOlity. contributions established by ~lomgomelY Stadium AuthOlity. an to de"elop the conference center. The through issued by the County bonds issued by the i\laryland Revenue Authority, of private investors that funded the development The hotel and conference center are overseen by a management 93 leased the conference and direct from ~10mgomelY County, The County Re,'enue Authority also leased the hotel portion of the site to a consortium representatives County. \\'hich is a of ~lontgomery Coumy and the i\laryland that includes Stadium Authority. and the facility is Md, Code Ann .• Econ. Dev. ~ 10-604 (2008 Repl. Vol.), 40 comnlittec of the hotel. Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 44 of 48 operated by ~\Ian;olt Hotd Sen;ces, conference center ofrers approximately Inc., under an agreement with ;,Iontgomery County. The 39,000 square feet of meeting space. In fiscal year 201 G, acti,.ities at the conference center generated, directly and indirectly, an estimated S45.9 million in spending, and ~;elded estimated tax IT'Tnues of more than S2.7 million for the State and nearly S I million for ;,Iontgomery 132. Furthermore, County."' as explained above, the State of ;'da~.land has suffered financial harm because it has a soverei,,'" interest in the receipt of tax revenues from facilities (like tbe National Harbor) that are in competition with businesses owned by the defendant and/or his affiliated enterprises outside the State. 133. The declaratory and i'1iuncti,.e relief that the plaintifE are seeking would remedy these injuries by eliminating the plaintiffs' competiti,.e disadvantage ,;s-il-\;s the defendant. V. CLAIMS COUNT I Violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause (Declaratory and Injunctive Relief) 134. violate-the As discussed in detail above, the defendant Foreign Emoluments has ,;olated-and will continue to Clause. The phrase "Person holding any Ollice of Profit or Trust," as used in the clause, includes the President. The phrases "'present" and "ElTIo]umcnl ... of any kind whatever" together cover anything of ,"alue, including without limitation moneta!)' and non-monetary gifts or transactions, transactions granting special treatment, and transactions above 111arginal cost. And the phrase "any King, Prince, or foreign State" includes any foreign govermnent and any agent or instrumentality thereof. "' Montgomery COIlIl!>'Cor!ferfl/ce Cenler Economic and Fisca/Impacl Report Gan. 2017) at 1-2. 41 AnalYsis Fl" 2016, Fina/ Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 45 of 48 135. The defendalll has accepted "preselll[sj" or "Emolumelll [s]" directly from-or from age Ills or instrumentalities of-China, the United Arab Emirates, Ku\\"ait, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Q,"ltar, India, Georgia, the United Kingdom, and other "foreign State!s]," \\"ithout seeking or obtaining "the Conselll of the Congress'. as required by the Foreign Emolumellls Clause. 136. As described more fully in paragraphs 29 10 78 herein, the defendalll is committing or will camlnit these \iolations in connection with transactions in,.olving the Trump International Hotel \\'ashington, D.C., 1'\ew York's Trump To\\"er and Trump \\'orld To\\"er, restaurallls the defendant mnlS or that arc located in his hotels or other properties, the television program '"The Apprentice" and its spinoffs and international ,.crsions, and other business and property interests and transactions in the United States and abroad. 137. As a direct result of these ,;olauons of the Foreign Emolumellls Clause, the plaintiffs, and their residents, have suffered signifiealll harm. They also stand to suller additional significant hann directly from the further occurrence of these violations. 138. No plan announced by the defendalll or his attorneys as of the date of this filing can make this conduct constitutional or othenvisc fCIlledy these constitutional ,ioialions. 139. The District of Columbia and the State of I\laryland arc entitled to injuncti,.e and declaratory rclief to slOP the abon:-mentioned Foreign Emolumellls Clause ,.iolations and any other Foreign El11olul11ellls Clause ,.iolations. This Court has the power to grant sueh relief pursuant to its inherelll authority to gralll equitable relief and 28 U.S.C. ~~ 1331 and 220 I. COUNT II Violations of the Domestic Emoluments Clause (Declaratory and Injunctive Relief) 140. to ,;alate-the As discussed in detail abm.e, the defendant has also ,;olated-and ,,;11 continue Domestic El11alul11ellls Clause. As President, he is the sale subject of the clause. 42 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 46 of 48 The phrase Prcsidcnt~s "any other under the clause coyers as set by Congress, "'Compcnsation~' paYJl1cnts or transactions, marginal Emolument" including remuneration monetary transactions granting special treatment, beyond the and nOIl-monetar\' and transactions above cos!. And the phrase "the United States, or any of them" includes any part of the federal government, instrumentality 141. any state government, and an" agent or thereof. The defendant is and will be accepting United States, or any of them." As described defendant any local governn1cnt, has committed more fully \iolatio!1S of the Domestic "any other Emolument" III paragraphs Emoluments from "the 79 to 99 herein, the Clause, and "ithout this Court's interyel1lion he "ill continue yiolate the clause. 142. As a direct result of these \iolations of the Domestic Emoluments Clause, the plaintiffs, and their residents, haye suffered significant harm. They also stand to suffer additional significant harm directly from the further occurrence of these \iolations. 143. No plan announced by the defendant or his attortleys as of the date of this filing can make this conduct constitutional or othcIV.'ise remedy these constitutional violations. 144. and injunctiye \iolations The District of Columbia and the State of l\Ial)'land relief to stop and preyent the abow-mentioned and any other \iolations are entitled to declaratol)' Domestic Emoluments Clause of the clause. This Court has the power to grant such rclief pursuant to its inherent authority to grant equitable relief and 28 U.s.C. 43 ~S1331 and 220 I. Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 47 of 48 VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland that this Court enter a judgment (a) respectfully request in their favor and against the defendant, consisting of: A declaratory judgment, stating that the defendant has \'iolated and will continue to \iolate the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses, as construed by this Court; (b) Emoluments (c) injunctive relief, enjoining the defendant from \iolating the Foreign and Domestic Clauses, as construed by this Court: such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. Dated:June 12,2017 THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA B:_~&~ KARL A. RACI:\E Attorney General for the District of Columbia NATALIE O. LeIJAII'.\\" Chief Deputy Attorney General Federal Bar No. 12533 na talie.l udaway@de.gov STEI'HA:"IE E. Lrros. Senior Counsel to the Attorney General stephanic.litos@dc.gov 441 Fourth Street, l\'.\\'. Washington, D.C. 20001 T: (202) 724-1521 F: (202) 730-1837 .pro hac vice applicationjortlicomillg BRIA:" E. FROSH Attorney General of l\laryland 44 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 48 of 48 STEVE:\":\I; SULLIVA" Federal Bar No. 24930 ssullivan@oag.state.md.us PATRICK B. HUGHES Federal Bar ;'110. 19492 phughes@oag.state.md.us Assistant Attorneys General 200 Saint Paul Place, 20th Floor Baltimore, ;\Iaryland 21202 T: (410) 576-6325 F: (410) 576-6955 :\'OAH D. BOOKBINDER* nbookbinder@citizensforethics.org STUART C.l\ICPHAIL* smcpllail@citizensforethies.org Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 455 ;\Iassachusetts Avenue, 1'1.\"., 6th Floor Washington, D.C. 20001 T: (202) 408-5565 F: (202) 588-5020 *pro hac vice applicatiollforthcomillg 45

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?