Santos Bey v. The State Of Maryland et al
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 1/6/2022. (c/m 1/7/2021 ybs, Deputy Clerk)
Case 8:21-cv-03160-PJM Document 7 Filed 01/06/22 Page 1 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
CHARLES COUNTY SHERIFFS,
DETECTIVE ROBERT SMITH,
STEVEN G. CHAPPELLE,
Plaintiffs
Civil Action No. PJM-21-3160
ERICK JAVIER SANTOS BEY,aka
Erick Anthony Santos
*
Defendant
*
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 13, 2021, Erick Javier Santos Bey, submitted a paper pro se titled "Legal
Notice ofRemoval"("Notice ofRemoval")and a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis.
Santos-Bey seeks to remove, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1441-1446, "the unconstitutional
complaint" in criminal case # C-08-CR-21-287 from the Circuit Court of Maryland for Charles
County to the District of Maryland. In that case, Santos Bey is charged by criminal indictment
with theft ($25,000 to under $100,000), forgery, and issuing false documents See
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiry. (visited January 5, 2021). His trial is set
for April 6, 2022. Id. Switching roles from defendant to plaintiff, Santos Bey also is suing
plaintiffs, the State of Maryland, Charles County Sheriffs, Detective Robert Smith, and Steven 0.
Chappelle for monetary damages without explanation as to how these parties were involved in the
matters alleged or violated the law. Santos Bey has not complied with the requirements ofStanding
Order 2021-3, in filing this action, although he was provided a copy of the Standing Order. ECF
Case 8:21-cv-03160-PJM Document 7 Filed 01/06/22 Page 2 of 5
Case 8:21-cv-03160-PJM Document 7 Filed 01/06/22 Page 3 of 5
Case 8:21-cv-03160-PJM Document 7 Filed 01/06/22 Page 4 of 5
Case 8:21-cv-03160-PJM Document 7 Filed 01/06/22 Page 5 of 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?