Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 1116

NOTICE by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc. re #1113 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony of Proposed Amgen Witness Nancy Spaeth Based on Additional Evidence (Notice of Service of Confidential Exhibit to the Declaration of Peter Fratangelo) (Toms, Keith)

Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Doc. 1116

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1116

Filed 09/24/2007

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION No.: 05-CV-12237WGY

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBIT TO THE DECLARATION OF PETER FRATANGELO IN SUPPORT OF ROCHE'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF PROPOSED AMGEN WITNESS NANCY SPAETH BASED ON ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively, "Roche") hereby certify, pursuant to the Protective Order dated February 7, 2007 [docket #274], that it served on September 24, 2007 by hand delivery, on plaintiff Amgen Inc.'s ("Amgen") counsel, Michael Gottfried at Duane Morris LLP and Deborah Fishman at Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP, and by Overnight mail on counsel for Ms. Spaeth, Harry H. Schneider, Jr. at Perkins Coie LLP, the following document which is designated as confidential pursuant to the protective order: Confidential Exhibit A to the Declaration of Peter Fratangelo in Support of Roche's Motion In Limine To Preclude Testimony of Proposed Amgen Witness Nancy Spaeth Based on Additional Evidence. This document has been designated as confidential and accordingly, Roche hereby submits this exhibit for in camera inspection pursuant to the Protective Order. It is necessary

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1116

Filed 09/24/2007

Page 2 of 3

for the Court to review this document, as it contains important facts and admissions that are highly relevant to the present motion. Pursuant to paragraph 14 of the Protective Order, Ms. Spaeth has four (4) Court days to seek leave of Court pursuant to Local Rule 7.2 if she seeks to have the Court deem this exhibit confidential and require its filing under seal. Dated: September 24, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts

Respectfully submitted, F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By their Attorneys, Keith E. Toms ______ Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) Kimberly J. Seluga (BBO# 667655) Kregg T. Brooks (BBO# 667348) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. [phone] [e-mail] Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Mark S. Popofsky (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Peter Fratangelo (BBO# 639775) Vladimir Drozdoff (pro hac vice) David L. Cousineau (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. [phone]

2

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1116

Filed 09/24/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pursuant to agreement of counsel dated September 9, 2007, paper copies will not be sent to those indicated as non registered participants. /s/ Keith E. Toms Keith E. Toms
03099/00501 744386.1

3