Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 1159

BRIEF by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc. Roche's Bench Memorandum No. 5 That Dr. Orkin Should be Precluded Under F.R.E. 802 From Offering Testimony on the Cloning Efforts of Biogen. (Fleming, Thomas)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 1159 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1159 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 05-CV-12237 WGY F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD., ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC. Defendants. ROCHE'S BENCH MEMORANDUM NO. 5 THAT DR. ORKIN SHOULD BE PRECLUDED UNDER F.R.E. 802 FROM OFFERING TESTIMONY ON THE CLONING EFFORTS OF BIOGEN In Dr. Orkin's report of May 11, 2007, he offers certain opinions on the cloning efforts of Biogen during the 1980's, based on "informal discussions with researchers at Biogen who were...attempting to clone the EPO gene." (Rebuttal Expert Statement of Stuart H. Orkin, M.D. at ¶41). Such opinions, in addition to being hearsay, constitute fact testimony and are not the proper domain of an expert witness. Dr. Orkin should therefore be precluded from repeating such opinions them at trial. In his May 11th report, Dr. Orkin makes the following statements: We were not alone in failing to clone the DNA encoding human EPO in the early 1980's. On several occasions I had informal discussions with researchers at Biogen who were also attempting to clone the EPO gene. The Biogen team was a world-class group of scientists. They indicated that they had encountered similar problems as we had and were equally unsuccessful. (Rebuttal Expert Statement of Stuart H. Orkin, M.D. at ¶41). Dr. Orkin's use of statements allegedly made to him by Biogen researchers over 20 years ago to prove Biogen had encountered particular problems in cloning EPO 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1159 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 2 of 3 constitutes hearsay. The statements allegedly made by unidentified Biogen scientists in "informal discussions" with Dr. Orkin do not fall under any recognized exceptions to the hearsay rule. This Court has recognized that, while an expert witness may rely upon the work of others, "he's not entitled to regale the court with hearsay." (Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 126 F.Supp.2d 69 (D. Mass. 2001), Trial Tr. at 221:6-7). What an expert "learned that [another research group] did is, as to him, hearsay." (Id. at 221:16-17). This expected testimony cannot be allowed under Federal Rule of Evidence 802. Additionally, Dr. Orkin should be precluded from offering factual testimony that purports to interpret Biogen internal documents. As the Court has already noted during the testimony of Dr. Lowe, Biogen documents, to the extent they are authenticated, "speak for themselves." (Trial Tr. 192:24). The Court has stated that it is "not going to allow" counsel to use expert witnesses as experts of the facts. (Trial Tr. 192:9-10). Roche respectfully requests that Dr. Orkin's testimony be limited accordingly. DATED: September 26, 2007 F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By its attorneys, /s/ Thomas F. Fleming Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Jagoe (pro hac vice) Vladimir Drozdoff (pro hac vice) 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1159 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 3 of 3 Peter Fratangelo (BBO# 639775) Krista M. Rycroft (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 836-8000 and Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on the above date. /s/ Thomas F. Fleming Thomas F. Fleming 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?