Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 1180

DECLARATION re #1179 Opposition to Motion of Kevin Flowers in Support of Amgen's Opposition to Roche's Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Adrian Katz by Amgen Inc.. (Rich, Patricia)

Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Doc. 1180

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1180

Filed 09/27/2007

Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE ) LTD., a Swiss Company, ROCHE ) DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, a German ) Company and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE ) INC., a New Jersey Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) AMGEN INC.,

Civil Action No.: 05-12237 WGY

DECLARATION OF KEVIN FLOWERS IN SUPPORT OF AMGEN INC.'S MOTION OPPOSITION TO ROCHE'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DR. ADRIAN KATZ

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1180

Filed 09/27/2007

Page 2 of 5

I, Kevin Flowers, declare as follows: 1. I am a partner at the law firm of Marshall, Gerstein and Borun LLP, counsel for

plaintiff Amgen Inc. I am admitted to practice law before this Court (pro hac vice) and all the Courts of the State of Illinois. 2. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge. If called to testify as to

the truth of the matters stated herein, I could and would testify competently. 3. On February 8, 2007, Roche served a subpoena on Dr. Adrian Katz in connection

with the current litigation. 4. Shortly thereafter, Dr. Eugene Goldwasser contacted me to inform me that Dr.

Katz had called him after receiving the subpoena from Roche. 5. Following my conversation with Dr. Goldwasser, I called the University of

Chicago's outside counsel, Matt Allison, an attorney at Baker McKenzie LLP in Chicago, to inform him of the subpoena served on Dr. Katz. 6. Mr. Allison informed me that the University of Chicago's counsel had decided

not to represent Dr. Katz since he was no longer an employee of the University. Mr. Allison said that he would call Dr. Katz to explain the situation and that he would tell Dr. Katz that I would be contacting him. 7. Thereafter, I called Dr. Katz and informed him that I represent Amgen in this

case, that I had spoken to Mr. Allison. 8. Dr. Katz informed me that he had already spoken with Mr. Allison. 1

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1180

Filed 09/27/2007

Page 3 of 5

9.

Thereafter, I met with Dr. Katz for about an hour and a half. During that time, I

discovered that while he remembered some facts about the clinical studies in question, there was not much that he could recall, and he did not know why Roche wanted to depose him. I explained that the subpoena required him to attend the deposition, and that if he did not remember something during his deposition he should simply say so. 10. Following my conversation with Dr. Katz, Amgen proceeded to serve Dr. Katz

with its own subpoena ensuring that Amgen's counsel would not be precluded from asking Dr. Katz questions at Roche's deposition. 11. On March 26, 2007, Roche withdrew its subpoena. Amgen informed Roche that it

would nevertheless proceed with the deposition. 12. At no time during my interaction with Dr. Katz did I pressure him into "providing

testimony without regard to his recollection or the truth." At no time did I tell him that I was representing the University of Chicago in connection with this case. 13. I informed Dr. Katz from my first conversation with him that I represented

Amgen in this litigation. At the beginning of the deposition I reminded Dr. Katz that, as he knew, I represent Amgen in this case. (Katz Dep. Tr. 5:19-21). 14. At no time did Roche object, during or after the deposition, regarding any undue

pressure or any improper conditions regarding Dr. Katz. There was no objection to the deposition or to conduct during the deposition until now.

2

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1180

Filed 09/27/2007

Page 4 of 5

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this 27th day of September, 2007.

/s/ Kevin Flowers Kevin Flowers

3

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 1180

Filed 09/27/2007

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document, filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of electronic filing and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on September 27, 2007.

/s/ Patricia R. Rich Patricia R. Rich