Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 1374

Supplemental Proposed Jury Instructions by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Fleming, Thomas)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 1374 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1374 Filed 10/14/2007 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 05-CV-12237 ) WGY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, vs. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL DEFENDANTS' PROPOSED FINAL JURY INSTRUCTION Defendants Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. respectfully request that the Court read the attached Supplemental Final Jury Instruction No. 1 to the jury in addition to the previously submitted Defendants' Supplemental Proposed Final Jury Instructions, filed October 10, 2007 (D.I. 1343) at the conclusion of trial. Defendants suggest that a logical place for this instruction would be between Instructions 4.14 and 4.15 of D.I. 1343. Dated: October 14, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Respectfully submitted, F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By its attorneys, /s/ Vladimir Drozdoff_________ Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Christopher Jagoe (pro hac vice) Peter Fratangelo (BBO# 639775) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 836-8000 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1374 Filed 10/14/2007 Page 2 of 4 Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 ktoms@bromsun.com 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1374 Filed 10/14/2007 Page 3 of 4 SUPPLEMENTAL FINAL JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1 FIGURE 6 OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT The sequence shown in Figure 6 of the patents-in-suit has a DNA sequence coding for 166 amino acids. The patent specification states that "the primary structural conformation (amino acid sequence) of mature human EPO as including 166 specified amino acid residues." `933 patent, col. 21, ln. 3-5. Thus, the protein described in Figure 6 cannot be anything other than 166 amino acids.1 Amgen Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Amgen Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 457 F.3d 1293, 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2006). 3 1 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1374 Filed 10/14/2007 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pursuant to agreement of counsel dated September 9, 2007, paper copies will not be sent to those indicated as non registered participants. /s/ Thomas F. Fleming Thomas F. Fleming 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?