Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 1414

MOTION for Leave to File Roches Motion for Leave to File a Brief in Excess of the Page Limit in Support of Its Motion for Judgment of Non-Infringement as a Matter of Law by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Fleming, Thomas)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 1414 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1414 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-CV-12237 WGY U.S. District Judge Young ROCHE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A BRIEF IN EXCESS OF THE PAGE LIMIT IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively "Roche") respectfully request pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 for leave to file a 21 page motion for judgment of non-infringement as a matter of law. A copy of Roche's proposed motion, which was handed up to the Court at the close of today's hearing, is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Roche has made a good-faith effort to address its request for a directed verdict in the space allotted by the local rules. Given the complexity of the legal issues, however, and the volume of evidence that Roche must address to adequately support its motion, Roche respectfully submits that it is reasonable under the circumstances to exceed the 20 page limit set by Local Rule 7.1(b)(4). Thus, Roche respectfully requests that the Court grant it leave to exceed the page limit. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1414 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I certify that counsel for the parties have conferred in an attempt to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion and that no agreement could be reached. Dated: October 15, 2007 Boston, MA Respectfully submitted, F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By its attorneys, /s/ Thomas F. Fleming Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Jagoe (pro hac vice) Vladimir Drozdoff (pro hac vice) Peter Fratangelo (BBO# 639775) Krista M. Rycroft (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 836-8000 and Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1414 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pursuant to agreement of counsel dated September 9, 2007, paper copies will not be sent to those indicated as non registered participants. /s/ Thomas F. Fleming Thomas F. Fleming 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?