Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 280

REFERRING CASE to Alternative Dispute Resolution.(Paine, Matthew)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 280 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 280 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT D IS T R IC T OF MASSACHUSETTS A m g e n Inc. Plaintiff(s) C I VI L ACTION V. F . H o f f m a n - L a R o c h e LT D et al Defendant(s) O R D E R OF REFERENCE FOR A LT E R NA TIV E DISPUTE RESOLUTION A f t e r consultation with counsel and after consideration of the various alternative dispute resolution p r o g r a m s (ADR) available, I find this matter appropriate for ADR and accordingly, refer this case to __________ADR Program -3/2007________________ for the following ADR program: NO . 05-12237-WGY _ _ _ _ _ __ SCREENING CONFER E N C E _ __ _X _ __ MEDIATION _ _ _ _ _ __ SUMMARY JURY TRIAL _______ SPECIAL MASTER ______ E A RL Y NEUTRAL EVALUATION _ _ _ _ _ _ M I N I -T R I A L _ _ _ _ _ _ S E T T L E M E N T CONFEREN C E _ _ _ _ _ __ PRIVATE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLU T I O N PROG R A M U p o n notification of the time and place designated for the proceeding, counsel are directed to be p r e s e n t with their clients or with appropriate settlement authority and to provide any written documentation w h i c h may be required for the particular ADR program. If counsel is engaged on trial or has any s c h e d u l in g conflict and a continuance becomes necessary, the provider of the ADR program and other c o u n s e l shou l d be a d v i s e d of th e co n f l i c t im m e d i a t e l y . February 15, 2007 DATE /s/ W i ll ia m G . Young U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE C A S E CATEGORY Ad m iralty Civil Rights Copyright/Trademark/Patent ERISA Labor Relations Person a l Injury Shareh o l d e r Dispute Other (ADR Referral.wpd - 4/12/2000) [orefadr.] Antitrust Contract Environmental FELA Medical Malpractice Produc t Liability Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?