Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 316

MOTION to Compel a Complete Response to Interrogatories 9, 10, and 11 to Roche by Amgen Inc..(Gottfried, Michael)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 316 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 316 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, a ) Swiss Company, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS ) GMBH, a German Company, and ) HOFFMANN LA ROCHE INC., a New ) Jersey Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Civil Action No.: 1:05-CV-12237 WGY AMGEN INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL A COMPLETE RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES 9, 10, AND 11 TO ROCHE Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 37(a) and L.R. 37.1, Plaintiff Amgen, Inc. ("Amgen") respectfully submits this Motion to Compel a Complete Response to Interrogatories 9, 10, and 11 to Roche, and asks the Court for an Order compelling Roche to: · Provide, on a claim-by-claim and limitation-by- limitation basis, the grounds that allegedly support Roche's assertion that the patents- in- suit are invalid for double patenting and/or with respect to 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 (a-e) and 103 (Interrogatory 9); Identify where each and every claim limitation is disclosed in each reference that allegedly anticipates any of the asserted claims (Interrogatory 10); Identify where each claim limitation is disclosed in each reference, how the references are to be combined in order to render each asserted claim obvious, where the motivation to combine the references may be found, and why there would be a reasonable expectation of success in combining the references (Interrogatory 11); Identify and describe, on a claim-by-claim and limitation-by- limitation basis, why one of ordinary skill in the art would have found the claims of the patents- in- suit not to be patentably distinct from the claims in the patents that allegedly invalidate the patents- in- suit for double patenting (Interrogatory 11); and Identify and describe, on a claim-by-claim basis, why 35 U.S.C. § 121 does not bar the application of obviousness-type double patenting (Interrogatory 11). · · · · MPK 123196-1.041925.0023 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 316 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 2 of 3 The grounds for this motion are set forth in Amgen's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel, as well as in the accompanying Declaration of William G. Gaede, III. Dated: March 13, 2007 Respectfully Submitted, AMGEN INC., By its attorneys, /s/ Michael R. Gottfried D. Dennis Allegretti (BBO#545511) Michael R. Gottfried (BBO# 542156) Patricia R. Rich (BBO# 640578) DUANE MORRIS LLP 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 500 Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: (617) 289-9200 Facsimile: (617) 289-9201 Lloyd R. Day, Jr. DAY CASEBEER, MADRID & BATCHELDER LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 873-0110 Facsimile: (408) 873-0220 William Gaede III McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 813-5000 Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 Michael F. Borun Kevin M. Flowers MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 474-6300 Facsimile: (312) 474-0448 Of Counsel: Stuart L. Watt Wendy A. Whiteford Monique L. Cordray Darrell G. Dotson MarySusan Howard Kimberlin L. Morley AMGEN INC. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 (805) 447-5000 -1MPK 123196-1.041925.0023 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 316 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I certify that counsel for the plaintiff has met and conferred with counsel for the defendants, F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., Hoffman LaRoche Inc. and Roche Diagnostics GmbH, in an effort to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion and that no agreement could be reached. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document, filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of electronic filing and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on March 13, 2007. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried -2MPK 123196-1.041925.0023

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?