Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 346

MOTION to Compel Roche to Produce Witnesses for Deposition Under Rule 30(b)(6) and Other Relief by Amgen Inc..(Gottfried, Michael)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 346 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 346 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LAROCHE LTD., ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, AND HOFFMANN LAROCHE INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 05 Civ. 12237 WGY AMGEN'S MOTION TO COMPEL ROCHE TO PRODUCE WITNESSES FOR DEPOSITION UNDER RULE 30(B)(6) AND OTHER RELIEF Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(2)(B) and 30(b)(6), Plaintiff Amgen Inc. ("Amgen") respectfully requests that this Court compel Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively "Roche") to designate witnesses for deposition on the topics enumerated in Amgen's Fourth Notice of Deposition to Defendants Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 30(b)(6). These topics are directed to the factual bases on which Roche is relying to support its allegations of patent invalidity and unenforceability and information which contradicts such allegations. Notably, a number of these topics are mirrorimages of the Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) topics served on Amgen by Roche, for which this Court, in its March 27, 2007 Order, compelled Amgen to produce Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses for deposition. In response to Amgen's Notice of Deposition, Roche refused to designate even a single witness. Instead, Roche has told Amgen that Amgen will have to rely on Roche's expert reports to discover the bases for Roche's defenses. Roche's refusal to designate witnesses in response to Amgen's Notice of Deposition under Rule 30(b)(6) is improper and has prevented Amgen from timely discovering the factual bases for Roche's invalidity and unenforceability defenses. This Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 346 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 2 of 3 in turn impedes Amgen's ability to prepare expert rebuttal reports and to prepare for trial. Compelling Roche to designate witnesses for Amgen's 30(b)(6) deposition will not be sufficient to compensate Amgen for its lost discovery time in this case. Amgen therefore also requests, as additional relief, that its time for producing expert rebuttal reports be extended. In support of this motion, Amgen submits a memorandum of law with exhibits. DATED: April 2, 2007 Of Counsel: Stuart L. Watt Wendy A. Whiteford Monique L. Cordray Darrell G. Dotson Kimberlin L. Morley Erica S. Olson AMGEN INC. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 (805) 447-5000 Respectfully Submitted, AMGEN INC., /s/ Michael R. Gottfried D. Dennis Allegretti (BBO# 545511) Michael R. Gottfried (BBO# 542156) Patricia R. Rich (BBO# 640578) DUANE MORRIS LLP 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 500 Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: (617) 289-9200 Facsimile: (617) 289-9201 Lloyd R. Day, Jr. (pro hac vice) DAY CASEBEER MADRID & BATCHELDER LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 873-0110 Facsimile: (408) 873-0220 William G. Gaede III (pro hac vice) McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 813-5000 Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 Kevin M. Flowers (pro hac vice) MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 474-6300 Facsimile: (312) 474-0448 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 346 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I certify that counsel for the Plaintiff has attempted to confer with counsel for the Defendants, F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., Hoffman LaRoche Inc. and Roche Diagnostics GmbH, in an attempt to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion and that no agreement could be reached. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants, on the above date. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?