Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 395

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Christopher T. Jagoe Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 1485343. by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Rizzo, Nicole)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 395 Att. 1 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 395-2 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) AMGEN INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 05-CV-12237WGY v. ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ) ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, ) and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER T. JAGOE IN SUPPORT OF PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION FOR DEFENDANTS I, Christopher T. Jagoe, declare that the following is true and correct, under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746: 1. I am counsel at the firm of Kaye Scholer LLP and member in good standing of the bars of the States of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. I am in good standing in every jurisdiction in which I have been admitted to practice. 2. jurisdiction. 3. I am familiar with the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the There are no disciplinary proceedings pending against me in any court or District of Massachusetts. Dated: April 16, 2007 /s/ Christopher T. Jagoe_____ Christopher T. Jagoe Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 395-2 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above referenced date. /s/ Nicole A. Rizzo_____ Nicole A. Rizzo 03099/00501 652764.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?