Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 509

MOTION for Summary Judgment of Infringement of '422 Claim 1, '933 Claim 3, and '698 Claim 6 by Amgen Inc..(Rich, Patricia)

Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Doc. 509

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 509

Filed 06/14/2007

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

AMGEN INC.,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No.: 05-12237 WGY v. ) ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE ) LTD., a Swiss Company, ROCHE ) DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, a German ) Company and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE ) INC., a New Jersey Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)

AMGEN INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF `422 CLAIM 1, `933 CLAIM 3, AND `698 CLAIM 6

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 509

Filed 06/14/2007

Page 2 of 3

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, Amgen seeks summary judgment that Roche's importation or sale of Mircera will literally infringe `422 Claim 1, `933 Claim 3, and `698 Claim 6. There is no genuine issue of material fact that Mircera literally satisfies all of the limitations of the claimed products of `422 Claim 1 and `933 Claim 3 as construed and defined by the Court. There is also no dispute that Roche uses the process claimed in `698 Claim 6 to make EPO. The grounds for this Motion are set forth in the accompanying Memorandum in Support of Amgen's Motion For Summary Judgment of Infringement of `422 Claim 1, `933 Claim 3, and `698 Claim 6, and the supporting declarations. Amgen respectfully submits the Court should enter judgment of infringement. Dated: June 14, 2007 Respectfully submitted, AMGEN INC., By its attorneys,

Of Counsel: Stuart L. Watt Wendy A. Whiteford Monique L. Cordray Darrell G. Dotson Kimberlin L. Morley AMGEN INC. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 [phone]

/s/ Patricia R Rich D. Dennis Allegretti (BBO#545511) Michael R. Gottfried (BBO# 542156) Patricia R. Rich (BBO# 640578) DUANE MORRIS LLP 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 500 Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Lloyd R. Day, Jr. (pro hac vice) DAY CASEBEER, MADRID & BATCHELDER LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

2

Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY

Document 509

Filed 06/14/2007

Page 3 of 3

William Gaede III (pro hac vice) McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Kevin M. Flowers (pro hac vice) MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I hereby certify that counsel for the plaintiff attempted to confer in good faith with counsel for the defendants in an effort to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion and no agreement could be reached. /s/Patricia R Rich Patricia R. Rich

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document, filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of electronic filing and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on June 14, 2007. /s/Patricia R Rich Patricia R. Rich

3