Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 529

EXHIBIT re #485 Declaration,, (Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Declaration of Krista M. Rycroft in Support of Roche's Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 1 of the '422 Patent is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. Section 112) by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 6#2 Exhibit 7)(Seluga, Kimberly)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 529 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 529 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION No.: 05-CV-12237WGY ) ) ) ) ) ) AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. Defendants. Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Declaration of Krista M. Rycroft in Support of Roche's Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 1 of the `422 Patent is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 Roche is filing these documents in the public record pursuant to paragraph 14 of the Protective Order. Amgen did not file a motion as to why the information is confidential trade secret material within the (4) Court day period of Roche's in camera submission, as required by paragraph 14. June 19, 2007 /s/ Kimberly J. Seluga Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) Kimberly J. Seluga (BBO# 667655) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 kseluga@bromsun.com Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 529 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above date. /s/ Kimberly J. Seluga Kimberly J. Seluga 03099/00501 689803.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?