Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 679

DECLARATION re #678 Reply to Response to Motion, Of Krista M. Rycroft by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2# 2 Exhibit 3#3 Exhibit 4 (part 1 of 2)#4 Exhibit 4 (part 2 of 2)#5 Exhibit 5)(Rizzo, Nicole) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2007 (Paine, Matthew).

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 679 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 679 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN, INC. Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. Defendants. ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Civil Action No. 05 CV 12237 WGY U.S. District Judge William G. Young DECLARATION OF KRISTA M. RYCROFT IN SUPPORT OF ROCHE'S REPLY TO AMGEN INC.'S OPPOSITION TO ROCHE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT CLAIM 1 OF THE `422 PATENT IS INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 112 Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 836-8000 Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Timothy M. Murphy (BBO# 551926) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel: (617) 443-9292 Counsel for Defendants F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. Dated: July 9, 2007 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 679 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3 I, Krista M. Rycroft, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that: 1. I am an attorney admitted to the Bar of the State of New York and am an associate in the law firm of Kaye Scholer LLP, counsel for Defendants in the above-captioned case. 2. I make this declaration in support of Defendants' Reply to Amgen Inc.'s Opposition to Roche's Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 1 of the `422 Patent is Invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112, dated July 9, 2007. 3. 4. Exhibit 1 is intentionally left blank. Exhibit 2, attached hereto, is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the July 3, 2007 Deposition of Harvey F. Lodish, Ph.D. in Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd et al., Civil Action No.: 05 Civ. 12237 WGY (D. Mass). 5. Exhibit 3, attached hereto, is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the June 22, 2007 Deposition of J. Donald Capra, M.D. in Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd et al., Civil Action No.: 05 Civ. 12237 WGY (D. Mass). 6. Exhibit 4, attached hereto, is a true and correct copy of Browne et al., Erythropoietin: Gene Cloning, Protein Structure, and Biological Properties, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 51:693-702 (1986) (AM-ITC 00461052-61). 7. Exhibit 5, attached hereto, is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the April 17, 2007 Markman Hearing in Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd et al., Civil Action No.: 05 Civ. 12237 WGY (D. Mass). 1 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 679 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3 Signed under the penalties of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1746 this 9th day of July, 2007. /s/ Krista M. Rycroft Krista M. Rycroft CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above date. /s/ Nicole A. Rizzo Nicole A. Rizzo 03099/00501 700873.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?