Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 697

NOTICE by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc. re #696 Declaration, Notice of Service of Confidential Documents (Toms, Keith)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 697 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 697 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. Defendants. CIVIL ACTION No.: 05-CV-12237WGY NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT TO BE FILED IN SUPPORT OF ROCHE'S REPLY TO AMGEN'S OPPOSITION TO ROCHE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT CLAIM 7 OF THE '349 PATENT IS INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 112 AND NOT INFRINGED Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Roche Diagnostics GmbH and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively, "Roche") hereby certify, pursuant to the Protective Order dated February 7, 2007 [docket #274], that it will serve on July 12, 2007, via hand delivery on plaintiff Amgen Inc.'s ("Amgen") counsel, Michael Gottfried at Duane Morris LLP, and via overnight delivery, on Amgen's counsel, Deborah Fishman at Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP, the following document which Amgen (not Roche) has identified as confidential: 1. Confidential version of Roche's Reply to Amgen's Opposition to Roche's Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 7 of the '349 Patent is Invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 and Not Infringed. Amgen has designated this document as confidential and has not agreed to Roche's request to file the documents in the public record. Accordingly, Roche hereby submits this document for in camera inspection pursuant to the Protective Order. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 697 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 2 of 3 Pursuant to paragraph 14 of the Protective Order, Amgen has four (4) Court days to seek leave of Court pursuant to Local Rule 7.2 if it seeks to have the Court deem such documents confidential and require their filing under seal. Roche will oppose any such motion within two (2) days. Dated: July 12, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Respectfully submitted, F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By their Attorneys, /s/ Keith E. Toms Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) Kimberly J. Seluga (BBO# 667655) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 ktoms@bromsun.com Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Mark S. Popofsky (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Peter Fratangelo (BBO# 639775) Vladimir Drozdoff (pro hac vice) David L. Cousineau (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 836-8000 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 697 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above date. /s/ Keith E. Toms Keith E. Toms 03099/00501 703358.1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?