Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 860

MOTION in Limine No. 14: Exclude PEG-EPO Experiments Conducted by Cords and Criticism of Amgen's Failure to Test Peg-Epo Based Upon Roche's Failure to Produce a Sample of PEG-EPO by Amgen Inc..(Gottfried, Michael)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 860 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 860 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LAROCHE LTD., a Swiss Company, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS ) ) GMBH, a German Company, and HOFFMANN LAROCHE INC., a New ) Jersey Corporation, ) ) ) Defendants. AMGEN'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 14: EXCLUDE PEG-EPO EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED BY CORDS AND CRITICISM OF AMGEN'S FAILURE TO TEST PEG-EPO BASED UPON ROCHE'S FAILURE TO PRODUCE A SAMPLE OF PEG-EPO Plaintiff Amgen Inc. ("Amgen") requests that this Court preclude Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively "Roche") from referring to or introducing into evidence testing performed by Roche's consultant, Dr. Cords, comparing Roche's Peg-EPO and EPO because, despite discovery requests and assurances that they would provide Amgen with a sample of Peg-EPO, Roche never produced any samples of Peg-EPO to Amgen. Dr. Cords ran certain tests comparing the in vivo biological activity of deglycosylated Peg-EPO and EPO, and then described the experiments and results in his expert report and a declaration, which several of Roche's expert witnesses cited in their expert reports to support their noninfringement opinions. Without a sample of Peg-EPO, Amgen was unable to replicate these tests and was limited in its ability to challenge Cords's test results. Roche should not be Civil Action No. 05 CV 12237 WGY Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 860 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 4 allowed to rely on its Peg-EPO test results at trial, or criticize Amgen's experts for failing to test a sample of Peg-EPO, after it promised to produce Peg-EPO to Amgen and then did not. Roche also refused to produce a non-redacted copy of the protocol run by Dr. Cords for his experiments. Roche should not be permitted to introduce such experiments, while denying Amgen discovery of the complete test protocol used by Dr. Cords. Accordingly, Amgen requests that this Court preclude Roche from (a) referring or relying upon any experiments performed by Dr. Cords and (b) referring to Amgen's failure to test Roche's Peg-EPO product. In support of this motion, Amgen submits a brief with an accompanying declaration and exhibit thereto. 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 860 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 3 of 4 Respectfully Submitted, Date: August 24, 2007 AMGEN INC., By its attorneys, /s/ Michael R. Gottfried D. DENNIS ALLEGRETTI (BBO#545511) MICHAEL R. GOTTFRIED (BBO#542156) PATRICIA R. RICH (BBO#640578) DUANE MORRIS LLP 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 500 Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: (857) 488-4200 Facsimile: (857) 488-4201 LLOYD R. DAY, JR. (pro hac vice) DAY CASEBEER MADRID & BATCHELDER LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 873-0110 Facsimile: (408) 873-0220 WILLIAM GAEDE III (pro hac vice) McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 813-5000 Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 KEVIN M. FLOWERS (pro hac vice) MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 474-6300 Facsimile: (312) 474-0448 Of Counsel: STUART L. WATT WENDY A. WHITEFORD MONIQUE L. CORDRAY DARRELL G. DOTSON KIMBERLIN L. MORLEY ERICA S. OLSON AMGEN INC. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 (805) 447-5000 3 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 860 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I certify that counsel for the parties have conferred in an attempt to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion and no agreement was reached. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as nonregistered participants, on the above date. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?