Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 879

NOTICE by Amgen Inc. re #878 Declaration,,,, #877 Memorandum in Support of Motion, of Service of Confidential Documents to be Filed in Connection with Amgen Inc.'s Motion in Limine No. 17 (Gottfried, Michael)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 879 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 879 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ____________________________________ ) AMGEN INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. NO.: 05-12237-WGY v. ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LAROCHE ) LTD., a Swiss Company, ROCHE ) DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, a German ) Company and HOFFMANN LAROCHE ) INC., a New Jersey Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS TO BE FILED IN CONNECTION WITH AMGEN INC.'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 17: TO EXCLUDE ROCHE FROM PRESENTING EVIDENCE TO CHALLENGE THE NON-OBVIOUSNESS OF THE DNA SEQUENCE ENCODING FOR HUMAN ERYTHROPOIETIN IN 1983 The Plaintiff, Amgen Inc. ("Amgen"), hereby certifies, pursuant to the Protective Order dated February 7, 2007 [Docket No. 274], that it served today, via hand-delivery, upon defense counsel at Bromberg & Sunstein LLP and via overnight mail to defense counsel at Kaye Scholer LLP, the following: · Confidential Amgen Inc.'s Brief in Support of its Motion in Limine No. 17: to Exclude Roche from Presenting Evidence to Challenge the Non-obviousness of the DNA Sequence Encoding for Human Erythropoietin in 1983 Confidential Exhibits 26, 34 and 35 to the Declaration Of William G. Gaede, III, in Support of Amgen Inc.'s Motion in Limine No. 17: to Exclude Roche from Presenting Evidence to Challenge the Non-obviousness of the DNA Sequence Encoding for Human Erythropoietin in 1983 · These documents contain information designated as confidential by the defendants ("Roche"). Accordingly, pursuant to paragraph 14 of the Protective Order, Roche has four (4) DM1\1180897.1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 879 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 3 Court days to seek leave of Court pursuant to Local Rule 7.2 if they seek to have the Court deem such documents confidential. Dated: August 27, 2007 Respectfully Submitted, AMGEN INC., By its attorneys, Of Counsel: Stuart L. Watt Wendy A. Whiteford Monique L. Cordray Darrell G. Dotson Kimberlin L. Morley Erica S. Olson AMGEN INC. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 (805) 447-5000 /s/ Michael R. Gottfried D. Dennis Allegretti (BBO#545511) Michael R. Gottfried (BBO# 542156) Patricia R. Rich (BBO# 640578) DUANE MORRIS LLP 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 500 Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: (617) 289-9200 Facsimile: (617) 289-9201 Lloyd R. Day, Jr. (pro hac vice) DAY CASEBEER, MADRID & BATCHELDER LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 873-0110 Facsimile: (408) 873-0220 William Gaede III (pro hac vice) McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 813-5000 Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 Kevin M. Flowers(pro hac vice) MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 474-6300 Facsimile: (312) 474-0448 2 DM1\1180897.1 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 879 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document, filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of electronic filing and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried 3 DM1\1180897.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?