Skyline Software Systems, Inc. v. Keyhole, Inc et al
Filing
74
JOINT STATEMENT of counsel re Agenda for Summary Judgment Hearing. (Woo, Darryl)
Skyline Software Systems, Inc. v. Keyhole, Inc et al
Doc. 74
Case 1:06-cv-10980-DPW
Document 74
Filed 02/21/2007
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
SKYLINE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. KEYHOLE, INC., and GOOGLE INC. Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-10980 DPW
JOINT PROPOSED AGENDA FOR HEARING ON FEB. 23, 2007 Plaintiff Skyline Software Systems, Inc. ("Skyline") and Defendants Keyhole, Inc. and Google, Inc. ("Google"), pursuant to the Court's request, submit the following Joint Proposed Agenda for the oral argument on pending motions for summary judgment set to be heard on February 23, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. I. Infringement A. Defendants Keyhole, Inc.'s and Google Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement (Docket No. 9, filed Jan. 19, 2007) 1. Google Earth Client a. b. c. 2. All Asserted Claims Claims 3 and 14 (download order) Claims 7-9, 18-19, and 22-24 (excess blocks)
Google Earth Fusion, Google Earth Server, Geo Coder Server
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:06-cv-10980-DPW
Document 74
Filed 02/21/2007
Page 2 of 3
B.
Plaintiff Skyline Software Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement (Docket No. 30, filed Jan. 19, 2007)1 1. Direct Infringement a. 2. Claims 1 and 12
Contributory Infringement/Inducement
II.
Invalidity A. Plaintiff Skyline Software Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity (Docket No. 11, filed Jan. 19, 2007) 1. 2. 3. B. TerraVision T_Vision Migdal/Cosman
Defendants Keyhole, Inc.'s and Google Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation Based on the Public Use of TerraVision (Docket No. 45, filed Jan. 19, 2007) 1. 2. 3. Claims 1, 3, 12 and 14 Claims 7, 18 (excess blocks) Claims 8, 22 (Internet)
Further, the parties intend to use visual aids, including Powerpoint presentations, and may also show audio-visual materials that were submitted as evidence. Dated: February 21, 2007 Respectfully submitted, By: ____/s/Darryl M. Woo_________________
Darryl M. Woo, admitted pro hac vice Michael J. Sacksteder, admitted pro hac vice Heather N. Mewes, admitted pro hac vice Carolyn Chang, admitted pro hac vice Saundra L. M. Riley, admitted pro hac vice FENWICK & WEST LLP
1
Docket No. 15 is Skyline's Assented-to Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation, and is not a Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement as indicated on the docket. No argument is necessary on this motion.
Case 1:06-cv-10980-DPW
Document 74
Filed 02/21/2007
Page 3 of 3
555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. (415) 875-2300 Fax (415) 281-1350 email: dwoo@fenwick.com Nelson G. Apjohn (BBO No. 020373) NUTTER McCLENNEN & FISH LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, MA 02210 Tel. (617) 439-2000 Fax (617) 310-9000 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants KEYHOLE, INC. and GOOGLE INC.
By:
____/s/Geri L. Haight_________________
H. Joseph Hameline, BBO #218710 Geri L. Haight, BBO #638185 Flavio Rose (pro hac vice) Ibrahim M. Hallaj, BBO #661333 MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO P.C. One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 Tel.: (617) 542-6000 Fax: (617) 542-2241 Attorneys for Plaintiff SKYLINE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
Certificate of Service I hereby certify that, on February 21, 2007, I caused a true and accurate copy of the foregoing document to be served upon all counsel of record for each party by complying with this Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. By: /s/ Darryl M. Woo Darryl M. Woo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?