Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 352

RESPONSE to Motion re #340 MOTION to Dismiss - Motion to Reassert Previous Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 232, 233 and 243) MOTION to Dismiss - Motion to Reassert Previous Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 232, 233 and 243) filed by Divya Narendra, Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss. (Meade, Tyler)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CONNECTU, INC., CAMERON WINKLEVOSS, TYLER WINKLEVOSS, AND DIVYA NARENDRA, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-cv-10593-DPW (CONSOLIDATED WITH CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:04-cv-11923-DPW) v. FACEBOOK, INC., MARK ZUCKERBERG, EDUARDO SAVERIN, DUSTIN MOSKOVITZ, ANDREW McCULLUM, AND THEFACEBOOK LLC, Defendants. CAMERON WINKLEVOSS, TYLER WINKLEVOSS AND DIVYA NARENDRA’S RESPONSE TO FACEBOOK’S MOTION TO DISMISS Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and Divya Narendra (“Founders”) acknowledge that the settlement requires that a judgment of dismissal be entered in these consolidated actions. The Founders reserve all rights to seek to vacate this judgment and/or to seek other appropriate relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), this Court’s inherent powers, and other provisions of law. Dated: July 21, 2011 Respectfully submitted, CAMERON WINKLEVOSS, TYLER WINKLEVOSS and DIVYA NARENDRA, By their attorneys, /s/ Tyler Meade Michael Schrag, Cal. State Bar No. 185832 (Pro Hac Vice) michael@meadeschrag.com Tyler Meade, Cal. State Bar No. 160838 (Pro Hac Vice) tyler@meadeschrag.com MEADE & SCHRAG, LLP 1816 Fifth Street Berkeley, CA 94710 (510) 843-3670 (510) 843-3679 (fax) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Tyler Meade, hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as nonregistered participants on or before July 21, 2011. /s/ Tyler Meade Tyler Meade   - 2 -  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?