Dunne v. Massachusetts Board of Bar Examiners et al

Filing 10

RESPONSE to Motion re 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Margaret H. Marshall, Roderick Ireland, Judiith A. Cowin, John M. Greaney, Massachusetts Board of Bar Examiners, William F. Kennedy, Jr, Anthony Massimiano, Alice Richmond, Geoffrey R. Bok, Michael Callahan, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. (Sterman, Anne)

Download PDF
Dunne v. Massachusetts Board of Bar Examiners et al Doc. 10 Case 1:07-cv-11166-DPW Document 10 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) STEPHEN DUNNE, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF ) BAR EXAMINERS, et al., ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-11166 DPW DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS COMPLAINT On September 6, 2007, Plaintiff filed a "Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint" in which he seeks to dismiss his complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss his complaint without the assent or stipulation of the defendants at this stage of the litigation pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(i) because the Defendants have not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. However, the Defendants wish to make clear that they have not agreed to limit the content of any future bar examination questions. The Defendants do not agree with or adopt the Plaintiff's statement in his motion that "Defendants removal of the question is assurance that all future examinees taking the Massachusetts Bar Examination will not be forced to accept, support or promote a liberal ideology on a professional licensing examination." That Defendants elected not to ask the same question on both the February and July, 2007 bar examinations merely reflects their standard practice of not repeating questions on successive bar examinations. Defendants maintain that the question to which Plaintiff objects was a legitimate question regarding the current state of the law in the Commonwealth. The Board of Bar Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-11166-DPW Document 10 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 2 Examiners maintains its right to test bar applicants on that same subject matter in future examinations. Respectfully submitted, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, et al. By their Attorney, MARTHA COAKLEY ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ Anne Sterman Anne Sterman, BBO # 650426 Assistant Attorney General Government Bureau/Trial Division One Ashburton Place, Room 1813 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2200 x 2109 Date: September 7, 2007 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this document(s) filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on September 7, 2007. /s/ Anne Sterman Anne Sterman Assistant Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?