Aguiar v. Webb et al

Filing 113

MOTION to Dismiss by Floyd Webb.(Kluft, David)

Download PDF
Aguiar v. Webb et al Doc. 113 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM V. AGUIAR, III, and the BLACK DRAGON FIGHTING SOCIETY, Plaintiff, v. FLOYD WEBB, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-CA-11673-MLW DEFENDANT FLOYD WEBB'S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant Floyd Webb moves to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the above captioned matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. As further explained in the accompanying Memorandum in Support, Plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege copyright ownership of the materials in dispute, and he cannot make out a case under Mass. Gen. L. c. 214 § 3A. Accordingly, this action should be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com Respectfully submitted, FLOYD WEBB, By his attorneys, /s/ David A. Kluft Brandy A. Karl (BBO #661441) Lawrence Lessig (pro hac vice) Anthony Falzone (pro hac vice) Julie Ahrens (pro hac vice) Center for Internet and Society Stanford Law School 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 bkarl@stanford.edu Tel: (650) 724-0517 and Michael Boudett (BBO # 558757) David Kluft (BBO # 658970) Walead Esmail (BBO # 666347) Foley Hoag LLP 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, MA 02210 Attorneys for Defendant Floyd Webb Dated: June 6, 2008 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.2(A)(2) I hereby certify that I conferred with counsel for Plaintiff on June 5, 2008 in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues presented herein. /s/ David A. Kluft David A. Kluft CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system on June 6, 2008 and will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). /s/ David A. Kluft David A. Kluft -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?