Aguiar v. Webb et al
Filing
115
MOTION for Extension of Time to July 3, 2008 to File Response/Reply as to 113 MOTION to Dismiss (Unopposed) by William V. Aguiar, III.(Repicky, Heather)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM V. AGUIAR, III, Plaintiff, v. FLOYD WEBB, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C.A. NO. 07-11673 MLW
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT FLOYD WEBB'S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff William V. Aguiar, III ("Aguiar") requests an extension of time to July 3, 2008 to respond to Defendant Floyd Webb's Motion to Dismiss. As grounds for this motion, Plaintiff states that the undersigned counsel has a family emergency and, therefore, will be unable to devote sufficient time and attention to the opposition and meet the original deadline of Friday, June 20, 2008. Counsel for Defendant has assented to the allowance of this motion. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant Floyd Webb's Motion to Dismiss be extended to July 3, 2008. WILLIAM V. AGUIAR, III, By his attorneys, /s/ Heather B. Repicky Ian D. Roffman (BBO# 637564) Heather B. Repicky (BBO# 663347) Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, MA 02210 (617)439-2000 hrepicky@nutter.com Dated: June 13, 2008
RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiff conferred with counsel for Defendant and have attempted in good faith to resolve or narrow the issues presented in this Motion. Defendant does not oppose the relief sought in this motion. /s/ Heather B. Repicky Heather B. Repicky CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that, on June 13, 2008, this document (filed through the ECF system) will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants /s/ Heather B. Repicky Heather B. Repicky
1742248.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?