Luckern v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Department et al
Filing
83
Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered DENIED 81 Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) Motion to Vacate Order of Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JEFFREY LUCKERN, Plaintiff, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., ANDREA CABRAL, Personally and as Sheriff of Suffolk County, GERARD HORGAN, Personally and as Supt. of the S.C.H.O.C., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ALBERT V. FRANCHI, Personally and as an Orthopedist at S.C.H.O.C., and THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI, Personally and as a Doctor at S.C.H.O.C., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Civil Action No. 07-12158-JLT
ORDER June 15, 2010 TAURO, J. Because Plaintiff has failed to give this court "reason to believe that vacating judgment will not be an empty exercise,"1 Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) Motion to Vacate Order of Summary Judgment [#81] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Joseph L. Tauro United States District Judge
Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehouse-men and Helpers Union, Local 59 v. Superline Transportation Co., Inc., et. al, 953 F.2d 17, 20 (1st Cir. 1992).
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
