Baker et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. et al

Filing 68

Judge Patti B. Saris: DISCOVERY ORDER entered sustaining in part and denying in part 46 Notice of Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, filed by James Baker, Janet Baker (Patch, Christine)

Baker et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. et al

Doc. 68

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ______________________________ ) ) ) ) v. ) ) GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., et al ) ______________________________) JANET BAKER and JAMES BAKER, Plaintiffs

Civil Action No. 09-10053-PBS

DISCOVERY ORDER November 3, 2010 Saris, U.S.D.J. After hearing, plaintiffs' objections to the Magistrate Judge's Discovery Orders of September 7, 2010 are SUSTAINED IN PART and DENIED IN PART [Doc. # 46]. Defendant shall produce all

substantive communications related to L&H or Dragon made to or by its trading group during the relevant time period, as well as the trading group's conflict of interest policy. Plaintiff's

objection with regard to the Magistrate Judge's ruling regarding defendant's trading of L&H securities, specifically its status as a market maker or proprietor trader, is DENIED without prejudice. However, plaintiffs may ask questions on this topic at the depositions and renew the request with a better explanation of the relevancy of the volume of the trading in L&H stock. With

respect to all of the remaining orders, plaintiffs' objections are DENIED as the magistrate judges' ruling was not clearly erroneous. /s/ PATTI B. SARIS United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com