RBS Citizens, National Association v. Aresty et al

Filing 61

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered ; ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS; The Motion for Leave to File A Reply (Docket #57) is ALLOWED; The Motion to Impound (Docket #56) is ALLOWED; The Motion to Strike (Docket # 58) is DENIED EXCEPT AS SET FORTH HEREIN; The Court will hold a hearing on the pending motions for summary judgment (docket #s 42 & 43) on May 26, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom #24. (Simeone, Maria)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) RBS CITIZENS, NATIONAL ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff/Defendant-in-Counterclaim, ) ) v. ) ) JEFFREY ARESTY and ) ARESTY INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM, ) ) Defendants/Plaintiffs-in-Counterclaim. ) __________________________________________) Civil Action No. 09-10116-LTS ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS May 5, 2011 SOROKIN, M.J. The Court will hold a hearing on the pending motions for summary judgment (docket #s 42 & 43) on May 26, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom #24. The Motion for Leave to File A Reply (Docket #57) is ALLOWED subject to a four page limitation and the filing of the reply by May 9, 2011. The Motion to Impound (Docket #56) is ALLOWED. The Motion to Strike (Docket # 58) is DENIED EXCEPT AS SET FORTH HEREIN. The Court treats Exhibit IX as an explanatory chalk or argument. The Court accepts Exhibit X as an accurate copy of the document filed with the court in New York. The relevance and, if necessary, the admissibility of the assertions contained within Exhibit X will be resolved by the 1 Court in the course of the ruling on the summary judgment motions. Plaintiff’s response to the First Motion for Sanctions (Docket #60) shall be filed by May 16, 2011. No further briefing or motions, beyond those authorized herein, shall be filed prior to the hearing without leave of court. SO ORDERED. /s / Leo T. Sorokin Leo T. Sorokin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?