Diaz v. Amand

Filing 47

Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Action on motion: After Considering Chief Magistrate Judge Sorokin's Report and Recommendation on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 44 and Report and Recommendatio n on Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider 43 as well as Petitioner's objections 45 and 46 thereto, this court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS both Report and Recommendation on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 44 and the Report and Recomme ndation on Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider 43 for the reasons set forth therein. Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider 38 is,accordingly DENIED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is also DENIED. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JUAN DIAZ, Petitioner, v. PETER ST. AMAND, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * Civil Action No. 09-10298-JLT ORDER March 7, 2012 TAURO, J. After considering Magistrate Judge Sorokin’s Report and Recommendation on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [#44] and Report and Recommendation on Petitioner’s Motion to Reconsider [#43] as well as Petitioner’s Objections [#45, 46] thereto, this court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS both the Report and Recommendation on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [#44] and the Report and Recommendation on Petitioner’s Motion to Reconsider [#43] for the reasons set forth therein. Petitioner’s Motion to Reconsider [#38] is, accordingly DENIED. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [#1] is also DENIED. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Joseph L. Tauro United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?