Hughes-Birch et al v. Manzi et al

Filing 121

Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM entered noting disposition of plaintiff's motion for order for relief from judgment. (Woodlock, Douglas)

Download PDF
Hughes-Birch et al v. Manzi et al Doc. 121 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS STACEY HUGHES-BIRCH Plaintiff-Appellant, LILY HUGHES-BIRCH, LEAH KEFFERSTAN Plaintiffs, v. HONORABLE MARY MCCAULEY MANZI, ET AL Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-10302-DPW -----------------FIRST CIRCUIT NO. 10-1500 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER December 7, 2010 It has come to my attention that in successive monthly Status Reports continuing through the Status Report dated December 2, 2010 and docketed in the Court of Appeals yesterday, the plaintiff-appellant Stacey Hughes-Birch has represented to the First Circuit that "the United States District Court has not responded" to her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion filed in this Court after the appeal in this matter was noticed. The plaintiff-appellant's representation is inaccurate, but remarkably the defendants-appellants have not bothered to seek to bring the disposition of the 60(b) motion in this Court to the attention of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, this Memorandum is designed to provide further notice that, as reflected in the docket entry # 119 of this case in the District Court under Civil -1- Dockets.Justia.com Action No. 09-10302, on August 30, 2010, an electronic order was "entered denying 109 Motion for Order for relief from judgment." The Clerk's Office of this Court shall hand deliver a copy of this Memorandum to the Clerk of the First Circuit. /s/ Douglas P. Woodlock DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?