Red Bend Software, Inc. et al v. Google

Filing 66

Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Michael Trinh Filing fee: $ 50, receipt number 0101-2854192 by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Magee, David)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RED BEND LTD. and RED BEND SOFTWARE INC., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. GOOGLE INC., Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. RED BEND LTD. and RED BEND SOFTWARE INC., Counterclaim-Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-11813 ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO ADMIT MICHAEL TRINH PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5.3(b) of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, David M. Magee, a member of the Bar of this Court, hereby moves for an order admitting pro hac vice Michael Trinh as counsel for Google Inc. in this matter. A Certification of Michael Trinh in support of this Motion is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. WHEREFORE, movant respectfully requests that this Court grant this Motion to admit Michael Trinh pro hac vice in this matter. Dated: April 6, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ David M. Magee David M. Magee, BBO # 652399 ( BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP One Federal Street Boston, MA 02110 (617) 951-8000 A/73342836.1/3005005-0000343244 Local Rule 7.1 Certification I hereby certify that counsel to Google Inc. and counsel to the plaintiffs conferred with respect to this motion and that plaintiffs' counsel raised no objection thereto. /s/ David M. Magee David M. Magee, BBO # 652399 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants, by federal express, on April 6, 2010. /s/ David M. Magee David M. Magee, BBO # 652399 A/73342836.1/3005005-0000343244 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?