Winfield v. Florent et al

Filing 18

Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered ALLOWED 10 Motion to Dismiss by Michael Watson and Comfort Suites Hotel; ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 12 Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Counts I and III through VII. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Count II; DENIED AS MOOT 17 Motion for Ruling to the extent that the Motion for Ruling requests a " No Harassment Order," that request is DENIED. IT IS S O ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

Download PDF
Winfield v. Florent et al Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MARIE WINFIELD, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH J. FLORENT, et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * ORDER Civil Action No. 10-10134-JLT September 24, 2010 TAURO, J. After reviewing Parties' submissions, this court hereby orders that: 1. Defendants Michael Watson and Comfort Suites Hotel's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [#10] is ALLOWED. 2. Defendants Joseph J. Florent, Michael Shinners, and Jason Pearl's Motion to Dismiss [#12] is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Counts I and III through VII. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Count II. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Ruling [#17] is DENIED AS MOOT. To the extent that the Motion for Ruling requests a "No Harassment Order," that request is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Joseph L. Tauro United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?