Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. GOOGLE, INC.

Filing 38

Letter/request (non-motion) from Google, Inc.. (Manning, Susan)

Download PDF
Susan Baker Manning Direct Phone: 202.373.6172 Direct Fax: 202.373.6472 susan.manning@bingham.com Our File No.: 0000352152 July 13, 2011 Electronically Filed Hon. Rya W. Zobel United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse 1 Courthouse Way Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Re: Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ (D. Mass.) Dear Judge Zobel: I write to advise the Court of defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff Google Inc.’s position with respect to the relief requested by plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Skyhook Wireless Inc. in its letter to the Court of Friday, July 8, 2011. Although not styled as a motion, Skyhook’s letter asks the Court to enter, on an interim basis, the protective order proposed by Google in its pending Motion For Entry of a Protective Order and accompanying Memorandum of Law, and attached as Exhibit A thereto. See Dkt. Nos. 29 and 30. Skyhook further requests that the entry at this time of Google’s proposed protective order not be viewed as prejudicial to the resolution of Google’s Motion or Skyhook’s own pending Motion For Entry of a Protective Order. See Dkt. Nos. 31-33. Google is amenable to entry of its proposed protective order, whether on either an interim basis prior to the Court’s resolution of the pending cross-motions, or on a permanent basis for the reasons set forth Google’s pending Motion and the accompanying memoranda. Google recognizes and agrees that should the Court prefer to enter Google’s proposed protective order while it further considers the appropriate scope of a patent prosecution bar (which is the single disputed issue presented in the pending-cross motions), this would not prejudice the Court’s consideration of that issue. For the sake of the record, I must note that, notwithstanding any contrary suggestion, Google has produced voluminous confidential documents to Skyhook that are available for use in this action. See Exhibit C to Ms. Somait’s July 8 letter (noting production of over 128,000 pages of documents in the related state case, including highly confidential documents, which the parties have agreed are deemed produced in this action). A/74434838.1 Hon. Rya Zobel July 13, 2011 Page 2 I am, of course, available at Your Honor’s convenience should the Court require any further information or assistance with regard to this matter. Respectfully, Susan Baker Manning cc: Lina F. Somait, Esq., counsel for Skyhook Wireless, Inc. A/74434838.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Susan Baker Manning, hereby certify that this document filed through the EFC system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on July 13, 2011. /s/ Susan Baker Manning Susan Baker Manning

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?