Zarlenga v. Scott et al
Filing
34
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered granting 16 Motion to Transfer Case to the Medical Malpractice Tribunal; denying without prejudice 18 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 23 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Service of Process; de nying as moot 27 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; granting 29 Motion to Transfer Case to the Medical Malpractice Tribunal; denying without prejudice 32 Motion to Dismiss. "...this action is stayed pending the outcome of the medical malpractice tribunal....So ordered." (Patch, Christine)
Zarlenga v. Scott et al
Doc. 34
United States District Court
District of Massachusetts
VICTORIA ZARLENGA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No.
10-11603-NMG
RICHARD M. SCOTT, M.D., CHRISTOPHER HARROD, M.D., BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, Defendants.
ORDER
1)
In accordance with Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 60B, the defendants' motions to transfer this case to the Suffolk Superior Court to convene a medical malpractice tribunal (Docket Nos. 16 and 29) are ALLOWED and this action is STAYED pending the outcome of the medical malpractice tribunal. As a result of the transfer and stay of this case, defendants' motions to dismiss (Docket Nos. 18 and 32) are DENIED without prejudice and plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file a response to the defendants' motions (Docket No. 27) is DENIED as moot. Finally, because the Court deems service of process to have been perfected with respect to all defendants, plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to complete service of process (Docket No. 23) is DENIED, as moot.
2)
3)
So ordered
Nathaniel M. orton United States District Judge Dated March 2{, 2011
-1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?