Shirokov v. Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver PLLC et al

Filing 97

Opposition re 87 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co KG. (Cain, Kevin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DMITRIY SHIROKOV, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-12043-GAO DUNLAP, GRUBB & WEAVER, PLLC; US COPYRIGHT GROUP; THOMAS DUNLAP; NICHOLAS KURTZ; GUARDALEY, LIMITED; and ACHTE/NEUNTE Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co KG, Defendants. OPPOSITION OF THE DEFENDANT, ACHTE/NEUNTE BOLL KINO BETEILIGUNGS GMBH & CO KG TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL Defendant, Achte/Neunte Boll Kno Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co. KG (Achte/Neunte) hereby opposes the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and appointment of class counsel. As grounds therefore Achte/Neunte incorporates as if fully set forth herein the legal arguments contained in the opposition memorandum filed by the co-defendants, Dulap, Grubb & Weaver, PLLC, US Copyright Group, Thomas Dunlap, and Nicholas Kurtz. (Document Number 96). Wherefore, Achte/Neunte respectfully requests that the Court deny plaintiff’s motion with prejudice. ACHTE/NEUNTE Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co KG, By its Attorneys, /s/ Kevin C. Cain Kevin C. Cain BBO # 550055 Harvey Weiner BBO # 519840 PEABODY & ARNOLD LLP Federal Reserve Plaza 600 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02210-2261 (617) 951-2100 Dated: April 30, 2012 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Kevin C. Cain, hereby certify that on this 30th day of April, 2012, I served the within Opposition of the Defendant, Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs GMBH & Co. KG to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel by causing a copy thereof to be sent electronically to the registered participants in this case, as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing. /s/ Kevin C. Cain Dated: April 30, 2012 766339_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?